Cited by 12Indian and Buddhist StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vedanā or Feeling Tone: A Practical and Contemporary Meditative Exploration

Batchelor, Martine·2018·Contemporary Buddhism

Abstract

This paper will attempt to establish a framework for the term vedanā. Then it will present the range of the different feeling tones: pleasant, unpleasant and neutral. It will point out that ‘neutral’ feeling tone can be defined in different ways as either non-existing, indeterminate, indifference or the beginning of equanimity. Following this, vedanā will be discussed in the context of the five nāma factors: contact, feeling-tone, perception, intention and attention. This paper will suggest that mindfulness can be of benefit because it possibly gives rise to what is referred to in the early Pāli texts as ‘unwordly pleasant’ feeling tones. The paper concludes by making a connection between the practice of mindfulness of feeling-tones and the cultivation of the ethical precepts as an antidote to unskilful reactive patterns that arise in relation to vedana.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14639947.2018.1442142

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subtlety is not a defining feature of vedanā.

    “Nor is subtlety a defining fea ture of vedanā , as Martine Batchelor suggests when she writes that the tendency to translate feeling 'tone' or hedonic 'tone' indicates vedanā 'is not a full blown feeling like the emotion of anger' (Batchelor 2018, 56).”

    From Do Buddhists Have Emotions? The Mysterious Case of Vedanā (2025) · cites this paper as Batchelor 2018, 56

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Analayo, 2003, Satipatthana: The Direct Path to Realisation
  2. Bodhi Bhikkhu, 2000, Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya
  3. Guenther Herbert V., 1975, Mind in Buddhist Psychology
  4. Walshe Maurice, 1995, Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha
  5. Weeraratne W. G., 2009, Encyclopaedia of Buddhism

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Batchelor, M.
Affiliations
Independent Scholar
Corresponding author
Batchelor, Martine
Venue
Contemporary Buddhism
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
54-68
ISSN
  • 1463-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7953
OpenAlex
W2795424819
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Buddhism (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
vedanā, Pali terminology, equanimity, Buddhist meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review