The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing
Abstract
Models of language processing which stress the autonomy of processing at each level predict that the semantic properties of an incomplete sentence context should have no influence on lexical processing, either facilitatory or inhibitory. An experiment similar to those reported by Fischler and Bloom (1979) and Stanovich and West (1979, 1981) was conducted using naming time as an index of lexical access time. No facilitatory effects of context were observed for either highly predictable or semantically appropriate (but unpredictable) completions, whereas strong inhibitory effects were obtained for inappropriate completions. When lexical decision time was the dependent measure, the same results were obtained, except that predictable completions now produced strong facilitation. In a further experiment the inhibitory effects of context on lexical decision times for inappropriate targets were maintained, even though unfocussed contexts were used, in which no clear expectancy for a particular completion was involved. These results were interpreted in terms of a two-factor theory which attributes the facilitation observed with the lexical decision task to postaccess decision processes which are not involved in the naming task. The inhibitory effects were attributed to interference resulting from semantic integration. In contrast to the results for sentence contexts, lexical contexts of the doctor-nurse variety produced clear facilitation effects on naming time (but no inhibitory effects). It was also shown that relatively minor variations in the type of neutral context could completely alter the relative importance of facilitation and inhibition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031564 · Cited by 2,949
Neely, J. H. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.106.3.226 · Cited by 2,828
Attention And Cognitive Control 1
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (2024) · Information Processing and Cognition · doi:10.4324/9781032722450-4 · Cited by 2,264
Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
Swinney, D. A. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90355-4 · Cited by 1,786
Bergum, B. O., Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Dornic, S. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421416 · Cited by 1,627
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x · Cited by 1,426
Lexical access and naming time
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80042-8 · Cited by 1,132
Self-citationSentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett
Matthei, E. H., Cooper, W. E., & Walker, E. C. T. (1980) · Language · doi:10.2307/413521 · Cited by 777
The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.
Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., & Lichten, W. (1951) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062491 · Cited by 769
Norman, D. A., & Bernbach, H. A. (1970) · Cited by 609
Cited by
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 · Cited by 1,087
A retrieval theory of priming in memory.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.95.3.385 · Cited by 781
Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?
Andrews, S. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802 · Cited by 468
Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(88)90071-x · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Forster, K. I.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-495
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W1985275332
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14640748108400804
- The paper
- Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.