Cited by 31Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Seminal oxidation–reduction potential and sperm DNA fragmentation index increase among infertile men with varicocele

Tanaka, Takashi, Kobori, Yoshitomo, Terai, Kazutaka, Inoue, Yasuyuki, Osaka, Akiyoshi, Yoshikawa, Naoki, Shimomura, Yukihito, Suzuki, Keisuke +6 more·2022·Human Fertility

Abstract

Varicocele is a common cause of male infertility. It is reported that low sperm concentration, motility and morphology are indicative of increased sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in men with varicocele. Although research has been conducted into the relationship between varicocele and DFI, little is known about seminal oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in varicocele patients. We assessed the relationship between varicocele with seminal ORP and sperm DFI in both fertile and infertile men. This prospective case-control study compared the findings from infertile men with varicocele to those of men with normal spermatogenesis without varicocele. Semen samples were collected and assessed using the WHO (2010) guidelines. ORP was measured (mV) and normalized to sperm concentration (mV/10 6 sperm/mL). DFI was measured using the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) method. For group comparisons, only samples with a concentration >1 × 10 6 sperm/mL were included. Infertile men with varicocele had significantly lower mean sperm concentration, motility and total sperm count. Conversely, infertile men with varicocele had a significantly higher mean serum FSH level, and higher ORP and DFI values than fertile controls. ORP was higher in patients with varicocele and positively correlated with DFI ( p < 0.01). ORP and DFI showed significant negative correlations with semen parameters (sperm concentration, motility and total sperm count) in infertile men with a varicocele.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14647273.2020.1712747

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanaka, T., Kobori, Y., Terai, K., Inoue, Y., Osaka, A., Yoshikawa, N., Shimomura, Y., Suzuki, K., Minami, T., Iwahata, T., Onota, S., Yamamoto, A., Sugimoto, K., & Okada, H.
Affiliations
Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Kobori, Yoshitomo
Venue
Human Fertility
Published
2020-01-20
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
142-146
ISSN
  • 1464-7273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-8149
OpenAlex
W3000930476
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Fertility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AMED (19gk0110027h0003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
varicocele, male infertility, sperm DNA fragmentation index, sperm DNA damage, sperm concentration, sperm motility, total sperm count, follicle-stimulating hormone, semen quality
MeSH terms
Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Semen, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Varicocele, Case-Control Studies, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review