Making space, making race: reconstituting white privilege in Buckhead, Atlanta
Abstract
The comfortable relationship between the overwhelmingly white, southern Atlanta neighborhood of Buckhead and a major hub of nightlife in the region unraveled in the early 2000s as the entire nightclub cluster was delegitimized, discursively constructed as dangerous and out of control, and ultimately razed to make space for luxury shopping. This paper sets out to query what social and cultural relations account for this massive and unpredicted reconfiguration of urban space in the epicenter of wealth, whiteness, and power in Atlanta. By mobilizing the concept of the socio-spatial dialectic (Soja 1980, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70: 207–225), we draw on Pulido's (2000, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90: 12–40) work on the construction and perpetuation of white privilege to argue that the racialized production of space is a relevant framework for understanding the processes at work in Buckhead. We argue that race was an unstated but deeply important social relation shaping the process by which this particular space was remade. In so doing, we seek to advance the literature on whiteness by demonstrating the ways in which it articulates with the political economy of cities in the present conjuncture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spatial theorists and researchers have revealed an intimate relationship between the construction, distribution, and composition of space and the behaviors, opportunities, and well-being of occupants.
“Spatial theorists and researchers have revealed the intimate relationship between the construction, distribution, and composition of space and the behaviors, opportunities, and well-being of those who occupy it (Hankins, Cochrane, & Derickson, 2012;Lipsitz, 2011;Sailer & McCulloh, 2012).”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Hankins, Cochrane, & Derickson, 2012
Cites
SOJA, E. W. (1980) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x · Cited by 901 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Utilizando el concepto de la dialéctica socio-espacial (Soja 1980), llevamos el trabajo de Pulido (2000) en la construcción y perpetuación del privilegio de la blancura para discutir que la producción de espacio racializado es una estructura relevante para entender los procesos trabajando en…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library
Brook, F., Ellenwood, D., & Lazzaro, A. E. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0048 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hankins, K. B., Cochran, R., & Derickson, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hankins, Katherine B.
- Cochran, Robert
- Derickson, Kate Driscoll
- Venue
- Social & Cultural Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-397
- ISSN
- 1464-9365 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1197
- OpenAlex
- W1994922187
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social & Cultural Geography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and sociocultural dynamics
- Keywords
- white privilege, whiteness, socio-spatial dialectic, urban space, nightlife, urban regeneration, luxury shopping, political economy of cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review