The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three participatory geographers: reflections on positionality and working with participants in researching religions, spiritualities, and faith
Open accessAbstract
This paper advances the geographies of religion, spirituality and faith’s limited attention to positionality by discussing the critical issues raised when using participatory approaches. Reflecting on three cases of participatory research, we foreground the dynamics of being a researcher with faith when working with participants from faith communities. Advocating participatory approaches as valuable methodologies that should be used more extensively to explore beliefs, faith practices, and social justice, we argue that greater attention needs to be given to the positionality of researchers undertaking this sort of research. Our cases raise three themes for discussion. First, the variety of ways in which faith positionalities influence how research is developed, conducted and concluded. Second, the intersections between our faith and other positionalities and how they shape our roles and relationships with research participants. Third, the fluid and multifaceted nature of faith positionalities and how they are changed, emphasized, and softened through the dynamics and entanglements of fieldwork. In doing so, we reflect on the complexities of being a researcher with faith, argue that faith positionality is a helpful dimension of their research rather than a limitation, and that all cultural, social and historical geographical researchers should reflect on their faith positionality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics
Rose, G. (1997) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913297673302122 · Cited by 2,390
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.5465/amr.2003.8925191 · DOI
- 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1503159 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00334.x · DOI
- 10.1080/14649365.2017.1419278 · DOI
- Bettis Gee, M., & Smith, R. (2015). Chapter 189. Moral imperatives: Faith-based approaches to human trafficking. In S. Brunn (Ed.), The changing world religion map. Sacred places, identities, practices and politics (pp. 3623–3648). Springer.
- Brace, C., Bailey, A., Carter, S., Harvey, D., & Thomas, N. (2011). Chapter 1. Emerging geographies of belief. In C. Brace, A. Bailey, S. Carter, D. Harvey, & N. Thomas (Eds.), Emerging geographies of belief. (pp. 1-8). Cambridge Scholars Printing.
- Brydon-Miller, M. (2004). The terrifying truth: Interrogating systems of power and privilege and choosing to act. In P. Maguire, M. Brydon-Miller, & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Travelling companions: feminism, teaching and action research (pp. 3–19). Praeger Publishers. · DOI
- 10.1080/00330124.2016.1252268 · DOI
- 10.1332/policypress/9781847428349.003.0005 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781849208949 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhg.2014.05.028 · DOI
- 10.1080/14649365.2019.1633685 · DOI
- 10.1177/1474474020933894 · DOI
- 10.1177/1474474007078206 · DOI
- 10.1080/14649365.2016.1163728 · DOI
- Dwyer, C., Beinart, K., & Ahmed, N. (2018). My life is but a weaving: Embroidering geographies of faith and place. Cultural Geographies, 26(1), 113–140.h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1177/1474474018792703
- 10.1525/9780520922464 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00024-X · DOI · Paper page
- Hopkins, P. (2009). Women, men, positionalities and emotion: Doing feminist geographies of religion. ACME, 8(1), 1–17. https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/818
- 10.1111/tran.12083 · DOI
- Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2009). Participatory action research approaches and methods. Connecting people, participation and place (3rd eds.). Routledge.
- 10.1177/030913259001400302 · DOI
- 10.1191/030913201678580485 · DOI
- 10.1177/0309132510362602 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.07.015 · DOI
- 10.1068/a45148 · DOI
- 10.1080/14649365.2015.1066840 · DOI
- Michalowski, R. J., & Dubisch, J. (2001). Run for the Wall: Remembering Vietnam on a motorcycle pilgrimage. Rutgers University Press.
- Miles, S. (2012). Take this bread. Canterbury Press.
- 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00815.x · DOI
- Olson, E. (2008). Common belief, contested meanings: Development and faith-based organisational culture. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 99(4), 393–405.h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00481.x
- 10.1177/1474474015612730 · DOI
- 10.1177/1206331208315933 · DOI
- 10.1111/area.12498 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00221.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhg.2019.01.001 · DOI
- Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME, 6(3), 374–385. https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786
- 10.1177/0309132516644513 · DOI
- Tracy, M. (2000). Racism and Immigration in Ireland: A comparative analysis (MPhil). Trinity College.
- Turner, V. W., & Turner, E. (1978). Image and pilgrimage in Christian culture: Anthropological perspectives. Columbia U.P
- 10.1016/j.emospa.2015.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1080/14649365.2016.1247194 · DOI
- 10.1111/area.12186 · DOI
- 10.1080/14649360903068100 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strunel, A.-M., & Cordoba, S. (2025) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2025.2505460 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Denning, S., Scriven, R., & Slatter, R.
- Affiliations
- Coventry University (GB)
- University College Cork (IE)
- University of Hull (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Denning, S.
- Venue
- Social & Cultural Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-09-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 892-910
- ISSN
- 1464-9365 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1197
- OpenAlex
- W3046851032
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Social & Cultural Geography (publishedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- by the Economic and Social Research Council award number GEOG.SC3315
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- researcher positionality, participatory research, spirituality, religious communities, researcher-participant relationship, intersectionality, fieldwork, social justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review