Cited by 16Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsStudy and Philosophy of ReligionParticipatory Visual Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three participatory geographers: reflections on positionality and working with participants in researching religions, spiritualities, and faith

Open access
Denning, S., Scriven, R., Slatter, R·2022·Social & Cultural Geography

Abstract

This paper advances the geographies of religion, spirituality and faith’s limited attention to positionality by discussing the critical issues raised when using participatory approaches. Reflecting on three cases of participatory research, we foreground the dynamics of being a researcher with faith when working with participants from faith communities. Advocating participatory approaches as valuable methodologies that should be used more extensively to explore beliefs, faith practices, and social justice, we argue that greater attention needs to be given to the positionality of researchers undertaking this sort of research. Our cases raise three themes for discussion. First, the variety of ways in which faith positionalities influence how research is developed, conducted and concluded. Second, the intersections between our faith and other positionalities and how they shape our roles and relationships with research participants. Third, the fluid and multifaceted nature of faith positionalities and how they are changed, emphasized, and softened through the dynamics and entanglements of fieldwork. In doing so, we reflect on the complexities of being a researcher with faith, argue that faith positionality is a helpful dimension of their research rather than a limitation, and that all cultural, social and historical geographical researchers should reflect on their faith positionality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14649365.2020.1815826

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.5465/amr.2003.8925191 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1503159 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00334.x · DOI
  4. 10.1080/14649365.2017.1419278 · DOI
  5. Bettis Gee, M., & Smith, R. (2015). Chapter 189. Moral imperatives: Faith-based approaches to human trafficking. In S. Brunn (Ed.), The changing world religion map. Sacred places, identities, practices and politics (pp. 3623–3648). Springer.
  6. Brace, C., Bailey, A., Carter, S., Harvey, D., & Thomas, N. (2011). Chapter 1. Emerging geographies of belief. In C. Brace, A. Bailey, S. Carter, D. Harvey, & N. Thomas (Eds.), Emerging geographies of belief. (pp. 1-8). Cambridge Scholars Printing.
  7. Brydon-Miller, M. (2004). The terrifying truth: Interrogating systems of power and privilege and choosing to act. In P. Maguire, M. Brydon-Miller, & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Travelling companions: feminism, teaching and action research (pp. 3–19). Praeger Publishers. · DOI
  8. 10.1080/00330124.2016.1252268 · DOI
  9. 10.1332/policypress/9781847428349.003.0005 · DOI
  10. 10.4135/9781849208949 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jhg.2014.05.028 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/14649365.2019.1633685 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1474474020933894 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/1474474007078206 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/14649365.2016.1163728 · DOI
  16. Dwyer, C., Beinart, K., & Ahmed, N. (2018). My life is but a weaving: Embroidering geographies of faith and place. Cultural Geographies, 26(1), 113–140.h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1177/1474474018792703
  17. 10.1525/9780520922464 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00024-X · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hopkins, P. (2009). Women, men, positionalities and emotion: Doing feminist geographies of religion. ACME, 8(1), 1–17. https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/818
  20. 10.1111/tran.12083 · DOI
  21. Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2009). Participatory action research approaches and methods. Connecting people, participation and place (3rd eds.). Routledge.
  22. 10.1177/030913259001400302 · DOI
  23. 10.1191/030913201678580485 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0309132510362602 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.011 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.07.015 · DOI
  27. 10.1068/a45148 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/14649365.2015.1066840 · DOI
  29. Michalowski, R. J., & Dubisch, J. (2001). Run for the Wall: Remembering Vietnam on a motorcycle pilgrimage. Rutgers University Press.
  30. Miles, S. (2012). Take this bread. Canterbury Press.
  31. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00815.x · DOI
  32. Olson, E. (2008). Common belief, contested meanings: Development and faith-based organisational culture. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 99(4), 393–405.h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00481.x
  33. 10.1177/1474474015612730 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1206331208315933 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/area.12498 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00221.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jhg.2019.01.001 · DOI
  38. Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME, 6(3), 374–385. https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786
  39. 10.1177/0309132516644513 · DOI
  40. Tracy, M. (2000). Racism and Immigration in Ireland: A comparative analysis (MPhil). Trinity College.
  41. Turner, V. W., & Turner, E. (1978). Image and pilgrimage in Christian culture: Anthropological perspectives. Columbia U.P
  42. 10.1016/j.emospa.2015.12.001 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/14649365.2016.1247194 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/area.12186 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/14649360903068100 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Denning, S., Scriven, R., & Slatter, R.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Denning, S.
Venue
Social & Cultural Geography
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
892-910
ISSN
  • 1464-9365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1197
OpenAlex
W3046851032
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Social & Cultural Geography (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
by the Economic and Social Research Council award number GEOG.SC3315
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
researcher positionality, participatory research, spirituality, religious communities, researcher-participant relationship, intersectionality, fieldwork, social justice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review