The DOI matches its Crossref record.
UNDP's Gender‐related Measures: Some Conceptual Problems and Possible Solutions
Abstract
This paper critically reviews conceptual and empirical problems issues with the United Nations Development Programme's two gender‐related indicators: the Gender‐related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Measure. While supporting the need for gender‐related development measures, the paper argues that there are serious conceptual and empirical problems with both measures that limit the usefulness of these composite indicators. Where appropriate and feasible, the paper suggests modifications to the measures that address some of the identified problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006 · Cited by 227
Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612441004 · Cited by 151
Ebbeler, C., Grau, I., & Banse, R. (2017) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022117719497 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Klasen, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Human Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-274
- ISSN
- 1464-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9516
- OpenAlex
- W2054170813
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UNDP's Gender‐related Measures: Some Conceptual Problems and Possible Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14649880600768595
- The paper
- Klasen, S. (2006). UNDP's Gender‐related Measures: Some Conceptual Problems and Possible Solutions. Journal of Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
