Cited by 20Dermatology and Skin DiseasesPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisAsthma and respiratory diseases

The evolving atopic dermatitis management landscape

Sahni, Vikram N., Balogh, Esther A., Strowd, Lindsay C., Feldman, Steven R.·2022·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis is a common dermatologic condition that affects millions of people worldwide, and a standardized approach to treatment was published by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) in 2013-14. Since 2014, new FDA-approved treatment options such as dupilumab and crisaborole have changed the landscape of AD management, and future therapies such as JAK inhibitors and anti-interleukin 13 and 31 antibodies appear effective, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review to give clinicians an updated toolbox to aid in pharmacologic management. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors explore the updated efficacy and safety data on established therapeutic options for AD including topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. In addition, the authors also explore trial data and studies on dupilumab, crisaborole, omalizumab, tofacitinib, ruxolinitib, abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, delgocitinib, nemoliuzumab, and tralokinumab. EXPERT OPINION: The AAD guidelines must be updated in the future to include several new treatment modalities that have revolutionized the pharmacologic management of patients with AD, including dupilumab and crisaborole. The future of AD treatment is also extremely bright, as JAK inhibitors and Il-13/31 antibodies have shown convincing results in the improvement of AD patients' lives in various trials and studies that have been examined in this paper.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14656566.2021.1999412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 20

Authors
Sahni, V. N., Balogh, E. A., Strowd, L. C., & Feldman, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Sahni, Vikram N.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2021-11-10
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
517-526
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W3214049954
Cited by
20
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
not funded
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, dupilumab, crisaborole, JAK inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, systemic immunosuppressive therapy, omalizumab, tofacitinib, abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, delgocitinib, tralokinumab, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Janus Kinase Inhibitors, Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatologic Agents, Eczema, Humans, Cyclosporine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review