Cited by 42Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchMedical Coding and Health InformationStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Validity of hospital discharge diagnoses for the assessment of the prevalence and incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Beghi, Giancarlo Logroscino, Anna M, Ettore·2001·Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders

Abstract

Introduction As amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurological disorder, many sources must be investigated for complete case ascertainment. Hospital discharge diagnoses (HDDs) are a source of administrative data for patients hospitalized for a given disease. The accuracy of HDDs was tested, to assess whether they could be used to trace patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods All the HDDs referring to patients with motor neuron disease (MND) (ICD-9 code 335.2) were identified from primary hospital discharge diagnoses made during the years 1994-95 in six target provinces of the Lombardy region in Northern Italy (total population 2922920). The medical records of the patients were reviewed and each patient was then accepted or rejected according to whether he/she did or did not satisfy the El Escorial criteria for the diagnosis of ALS. The ALS discharge diagnoses filed in the study period in the neurology departments of all the regional hospitals were the 'gold standard'. Newly diagnosed patients registered during the year 1998 in the same provinces served for the calculation of the incidence of the disease. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were calculated. Data were presented separately for all the patients and those who were indicated as first hospital admissions. Results During the study period a total of 1012122 hospital discharge records were coded in the six index provinces. The ICD-9 code 335.2 was reported in 408 of the…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/146608201316949541

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beghi, G. L.
Venue
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders
Published
2001-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
99-104
ISSN
1466-0822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157387312
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Regione Lombardia
  • Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, hospital discharge diagnoses, administrative data, case ascertainment, diagnostic accuracy, motor neuron disease, El Escorial criteria, ALS incidence, Lombardy, sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, false positives, rare neurological diseases
MeSH terms
Admitting Department, Hospital, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Humans, Italy, Patient Discharge, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review