The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voting intentions in Africa: ethnic, economic or partisan?
Abstract
This paper offers a first comprehensive account of popular voting intentions in Africa's new electoral democracies. With reference to aggregate and survey data from 16 countries, this paper shows that competitive elections in Africa are more than mere ethnic censuses or simple economic referenda. Instead, Africans engage in both ethnic and economic voting. Not surprisingly, people who belong to the ethnic group in power intend to support the ruling party, in contrast to those who feel a sense of discrimination against their cultural group. But, to an even greater extent, would-be voters in Africa consider policy performance, especially the government's perceived handling of unemployment, inflation, and income distribution. Moreover, a full account of the intended vote choice in Africa also requires recognition that citizens are motivated – sincerely or strategically – by partisan considerations; they vote for established ruling parties because they expect that incumbents will win. This paper shows that voters attempt to associate themselves with prospective winners because they wish to gain access to material benefits and to avoid retribution after the election. These dynamics are most evident in African countries where dominant parties restrict the range of electoral choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781353 · Cited by 3,459
Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars
Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054201468 · Cited by 1,386 · cited 3×
“To capture social context, we employ statistics that measure the fractionalisation of ‘politically relevant ethnic groups’ (PREG) (Posner, 2004)14 and the degree of ethnic polarisation, the maximal when individuals belong to one of two rival groups of the same size, the former maximal when every individual belongs to…”
BackgroundMethodInstitutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa
Posner, D. N. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808661 · Cited by 1,113
A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society
Horowitz, D. L. (1991) · doi:10.1525/9780520328884 · Cited by 689 · cited 1×
“In Africa, ethnic identity – that is, the inclination of individuals to define themselves in terms of cultural origins and descent-based traits – is widely perceived to be the predominant organising principle of society and politics (Olorunsola, 1972; Horowitz, 1991; Berman et al., 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Exploiting the Poor: Bureaucratic Corruption and Poverty in Africa
Justesen, M. K., & Bjørnskov, C. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.002 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Bratton, M., Bhavnani, R., & Chen, T.-H.
- Venue
- Commonwealth & Comparative Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-52
- ISSN
- 1466-2043 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9094
- OpenAlex
- W2037786765
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 91.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voting intentions in Africa: ethnic, economic or partisan? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14662043.2012.642121
- The paper
- Bratton, M., Bhavnani, R., & Chen, T.-H. (2012). Voting intentions in Africa: ethnic, economic or partisan? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2012.642121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.