Cited by 19China's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceDiaspora, migration, transnational identity

Tibetan translocalities: navigating urban opportunities and new ways of belonging in Tibetan pastoral communities in China

Washul, Eveline·2018·Critical Asian Studies

Abstract

Urban development in Tibetan areas of China lags behind that of other non-coastal, rural areas and occurs at a significantly smaller scale due to remote and mountainous terrain and a lower population density. However, just as in the rest of China, urban development in Tibetan regions is characterized by an unevenness that constitutes and produces new translocal ties, as people belong to multiple localities at the same time. But Tibetan patterns of translocal ties are unique. For college-educated Tibetans, structural factors such as educational institutions and ethnic discrimination and affective factors such as attachment to home places powerfully shape the landscape of urban opportunities along ethnic lines. Instead of educational and employment structures enabling Tibetans to pursue economic opportunities in urban centers across the country, socio-ethnic inequalities and thick relational ties eventually bring many Tibetan graduates back to the urban centers administratively connected to their rural home places in Tibetan areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14672715.2018.1520606

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common critique among Washul's interlocutors was that urban living Sinicizes young Tibetans, making them less identifiable as Tibetans and more like ethnic Chinese, who are perceived as distant, unfathomable, and even duplicitous.

    “A common critique was that: 'urban living Sinicizes them [young Tibetans], making them less identifiable or relatable as Tibetans and more like ethnic Chinese, who are perceived as distant, unfathomable, and even duplicitous' (502).”
  • Washul relates a similar narrative of cultural subsistence crisis among Tibetan interlocutors who saw cities as places of loss or threat of loss of a uniquely Tibetan self and way of life.

    “In her work on Tibetans in urban China, Eveline Washul relates a similar narrative of cultural subsistence crisis among her Tibetan interlocutors who saw cities as 'places of loss or the threat of loss, of a uniquely Tibetan self and way of life' (2018: 502).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Washul, E.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Washul, Eveline
Venue
Critical Asian Studies
Published
2018-10-02
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
493-517
ISSN
  • 1467-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-6033
OpenAlex
W2895486215
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Asian Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • a Mellon Graduate Dissertation Fellowship
  • Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  • Fulbright Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
Keywords
translocality, urbanization, ethnic discrimination, educational inequality, university graduates, return migration, urban-rural relations, place attachment, sense of belonging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review