Cited by 42China's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsAnthropological Studies and InsightsGeographies of human-animal interactions

The Battle for Fortune: State-Led Development, Personhood, and Power among Tibetans in China

Makley, Charlene·2018·Cornell University Press eBooks

Abstract

Based on long-term fieldwork in a rural Tibetan region in China’s northwest (2002-13), The Battle for Fortune is an ethnography of state-local relations among Tibetans marginalized underChina’s Great Develop the West campaign and during the 2008 military crackdown on Tibetan unrest. The study brings anthropological approaches to states and development into dialogue with recent interdisciplinary debates about the very nature of human subjectivity and relations with nonhuman others (including deities). The author does this by drawing on a linguistic anthropological approach to contested presence (as an ongoing “battle for fortune”). For most Tibetans, the active presence of deities and other invisible beings has been the ground of power, causation, and fertile or fortunate landscapes. The author thus takes divine beings seriously as interlocutors and parties to exchange in Rebgong, refusing to relegate them to a separate, less consequential, “religious” or “premodern” world. The book thus challenges readers to grasp the unpredictable, even violent, interpersonal dynamics at the heart of development projects in China and elsewhere. And it encourages a more multidimensional and dynamic understanding of state-local relations than mainstream accounts of development and unrest that portray Tibet and China as a kind of yin-and-yang pair for models of statehood and development in a new global order.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7591/9781501719653

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It intensified after the turn of the millennium with accelerated state-sponsored development, and again after 2008 when fast-track economic growth and urbanization were deployed as a facet of the Chinese leadership's response to Tibetan unrest.

    “But it intensified after the turn of the millennium with accelerated state-sponsored development, and again after 2008 when fast-track economic growth and urbanization were deployed as a facet of the Chinese leadership's response to Tibetan unrest (Makley 2018; Caple 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makley, C.
Corresponding author
Makley, Charlene
Venue
Cornell University Press eBooks
Published
2018-05-15
OpenAlex
W3195687042
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
4.32
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cornell University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
Keywords
state-local relations, military crackdown, deities, divine being, human subjectivity, non-human beings, development projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review