The Politician, The Wife, The Citizen, and her Newspaper: Rethinking women, democracy, and media(ted) representation
Open accessAbstract
Recent dramatic rises in the number of women elected to British parliaments have renewed critical interest in the significance of gender, and ways of theorising and researching women's political representation. However, the central role played by the media in contemporary politics is often neglected in feminist political scholarship. At the same time, the spaces occupied by women in political news journalism and the body politic remain under-explored by media theorists. This article argues that if we are to fully understand the politics of representation and what fairer representation for women might mean, we need to address these neglected dimensions. To make the case, I present an analysis of press coverage of the 1997 British General Election campaign. This seeks to draw together conventionally disparate strands of feminist, political and media theorising in order to highlight the gendered politics of newspaper imag(in)ing, storytelling, and commentary. Improving women's presence in media(ted) political discourse, I conclude, might be one means of strengthening women's symbolic and substantive representation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings from the United Kingdom and elsewhere indicate a consistent gender gap in politicians' visibility both during and between elections.
“Findings from the United Kingdom and elsewhere indicate a consistent gender gap in politicians’ visibility both during and between elections (Adcock 2010;Banwart et al. 2003;Braden 1996;Campbell and Childs 2010;Gidengil and Everitt 2003;Heldman et al. 2005;Kahn 1994; Kahn and Goldenberg 1991;O’Neill et al. 2016;Ross 2002).”
From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as Adcock 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Adcock, C.
- Corresponding author
- Adcock, Charlotte
- Venue
- Feminist Media Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-159
- ISSN
- 1468-0777 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5902
- OpenAlex
- W1490048915
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Feminist Media Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Keywords
- women's political representation, gender and politics, media coverage, 1997 British general election, feminist political theory, media representation of women, symbolic representation, substantive representation, women in parliament, political discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review