The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism
Abstract
This article investigates the renewed feminist politics that emerge from the interface of digital platforms and activism today, examining the role of digital media in affecting the particular ways that contemporary feminist protests make meaning and are understood transnationally, nationally, and locally. I consider the political investments of digital feminisms in the context of what Angela McRobbie has termed the “undoing of feminism” in neoliberal societies, where discourses of choice, empowerment, and individualism have made feminism seem both second nature and unnecessary. Within this context, I describe a range of recent feminist protest actions that are in a sense redoing feminism for a neoliberal age. A key component of this redoing is the way recent protest actions play out central tensions within historical and contemporary feminist discourse; crucial here is the interrelationship between body politics experienced locally and feminist actions whose efficacy relies on their translocal and transnational articulation. My discussion focuses on three case studies: SlutWalk Berlin, Peaches’ “Free Pussy Riot!” video, and the Twitter campaigns #Aufschrei and #YesAllWomen. My analysis ultimately calls attention to the precarity of digital feminisms, which reflect both the oppressive nature of neoliberalism and the possibilities it offers for new subjectivities and social formations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence
Butler, J. (2004) · Cited by 7,903
Butler, J. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203499627 · Cited by 5,556
Berlant, L. (2011) · doi:10.1215/9780822394716 · Cited by 5,334
The twilight of equality?: neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6822 · Cited by 2,988
The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change
McRobbie, Á. (2008) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · Cited by 2,802
A brief history of neoliberalism
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1213 · Cited by 2,729
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005) · International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9 · Cited by 2,557
8 The Precariat The New Dangerous Class?
(2025) · Precarity in Western European Cinema · doi:10.1515/9789048560660-009 · Cited by 2,105
The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class
Standing, G. (2011) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781849664554 · Cited by 1,998
Bourdıeu, P., & Nice, R. W. (1998) · HAL · Cited by 1,422
Cited by
#MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018) · European Journal of Women's Studies · doi:10.1177/1350506818765318 · Cited by 772
(2020) · doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1837908 · Cited by 159
“Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere
Dickel, V., & Evolvi, G. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925 · Cited by 122
Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed
Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819884635 · Cited by 66
Feminist responses to COVID-19 in China through the lens of affect
Zhang, J. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2041694 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Baer, H.
- Venue
- Feminist Media Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-10-16
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-34
- ISSN
- 1468-0777 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5902
- OpenAlex
- W2173085103
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 45.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070
- The paper
- Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.