Cited by 5,334Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction

Cruel Optimism

Berlant, Lauren·2011·Duke University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/9780822394716

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following Berlant's concept of cruel optimism, there is an obvious cruelty in teachers' lived experience through the deliberate forcing of actions and subjugation of their own belief systems within a powerful and unyielding policy discourse.

    “Following Berlant's (2011) concept of cruel optimism, there is an obvious cruelty on teachers' lived experience here, through the deliberate forcing of actions and the subjugation of their own belief systems within a powerful and unyielding policy discourse.”

    From The policy and practice of music education in England, 2010–2020 (2021) · cites this paper as Berlant, 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berlant, L.
Corresponding author
Berlant, Lauren
Venue
Duke University Press eBooks
Published
2011
OpenAlex
W4237315412
Cited by
5,334
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 653 · 2025: 483 · 2024: 389 · 2023: 528 · 2022: 405 · 2021: 361 · 2020: 545 · 2019: 530 · 2018: 375 · 2017: 296 · 2016: 223 · 2015: 187 · 2014: 206 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 42
FWCI
46.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Keywords
cruelty, optimism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review