The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“A series of little high fives”: mental health and digital habituation in women’s Instagram practices
Abstract
Headlines about the negative impact of Instagram on women’s mental health abound in public conversations. Yet, in a neoliberal context of limited care services and gendered pressures to “control” one’s emotions, many women are also turning to Instagram for dealing with the disabling effects of mental illness. Looking at how women use Instagram for creating and finding resources, this article complicates the general assumption that “bad” social media habits maintain psychological status quo. It considers, instead, the complex role that digital habits play in women’s experience of mental illness. Making a feminist media studies intervention into the study of mediated care, it argues that women's use of Instagram for mental health shapes their experience of mental illness through what the author calls digital habituation. The article focuses on the stories of three women—collected through in-depth interviews and media go-alongs – to demonstrate that however contradictory their digital habits may be, at times participating in postfeminist self-regulation, they simultaneously provide soothing affects. While popular discourses around gender, social media, and mental illness are tainted with moral panic, digital habituation offers a capacious framework for considering the potential and limits of using social media for women’s health.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women consumed Instagram mental health content to help them get through their day.
“For example, Gravel-Patry (2022) observed that women consumed Instagram mental health content to help them get through their day.”
From ‘YOU CANNOT EXPECT SUCH VALIDATION IN REAL LIFE:’ HISTORICAL CONTINUITIES AND CHANGE IN WOMEN’S ROMANCING WITH AI CHATBOT REPLIKA (2025) · cites this paper as Gravel-Patry, 2022
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York, London: Routledge.
- 10.1177/1367549404042496 · DOI
- 10.5325/utopianstudies.22.2.0233 · DOI
- 10.1111/papt.12222 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.203 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9715.003.0008 · DOI
- 10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.99 · DOI
- Duffy, Brooke Erin, and Emily Hund. 2019. “Gendered Visibility on Social Media: Navigating Instagram’s Authenticity Bind.” International Journal of Communication 13 (0): 20.
- 10.1145/3274320 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-11626-2 · DOI
- 10.3390/socsci6040135 · DOI
- Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2011. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” In Feminist Disability Studies, edited by Kim Q. Hall, 13–48. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- 10.1093/joc/jqy002 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003085201-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203731093 · DOI
- 10.1177/2056305120963832 · DOI
- Hendry, Natalie Ann, Brady Robards, and Sonya Stanford. 2017. ”Beyond Social Media Panics for ‘At Risk’ Youth in Mental Health Practice.” In Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Mental Health Policy and Practice, edited by Sony Stanford, Elaine Sharland, and Nina Rovinelli Heller, 135–154. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- 10.4135/9781412984270.n5 · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520941311 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444819878806 · DOI
- 10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22429 · DOI
- 10.1093/med:psych/9780195094862.001.0001 · DOI
- Kearney, Mary Celeste. 2006. Girls Make Media. New York; London: Routledge.
- 10.4324/9781315755632 · DOI
- MacDonald, Shana, Michelle MacArthur, Milena Radzikowska, and Brianna I. Wiens. 2021. Networked Feminisms: Activist Assemblies and Digital Practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818784303 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444820921349 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1215/9781478021834 · DOI
- 10.1057/s41286-017-0025-y · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv1m0khq4 · DOI
- Piepmeier, Alison. 2009. Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism. New York: New York University Press.
- 10.4324/9781315728346-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464700115604136 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959353519826162 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18574/nyu/9781479808342.001.0001 · DOI
- Showalter, Elaine. 1987. The Female Malady. London: Virago.
- 10.1111/1467-9566.12545 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446250945 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Depounti, I., & Saukko, P. (2025) · AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research · doi:10.5210/spir.v2024i0.13927 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gravel-Patry, F.
- Affiliations
- Department of Communication Studies, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- ORCID
- Gravel-Patry, Fanny
- Venue
- Feminist Media Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-11-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4073-4088
- ISSN
- 1468-0777
- 1471-5902
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Concordia University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review