The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture
Abstract
In recent years, feminists have turned to digital technologies and social media platforms to dialogue, network, and organize against contemporary sexism, misogyny, and rape culture. The emergence of feminist campaigns such as #MeToo, #BeenRapedNeverReported, and Everyday Sexism are part of a growing trend of digital resistances and challenges to sexism, patriarchy, and other forms of oppression. Although recent scholarship has documented the ways digital spaces are often highly creative sites where the public can learn about and intervene in rape culture, little research has explored girls’ and women’s experiences of using digital platforms to challenge misogynistic practices. This is therefore the first book-length study to interrogate how girls and women negotiate rape culture through digital platforms, including blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, and mobile apps. Through an analysis of high-profile campaigns such as Hollaback!, Everyday Sexism, and the everyday activism of Twitter feminists, this book presents findings of over 800 pieces of digital content, and semi-structured interviews with 82 girls, women, and some men around the world, including organizers of various feminist campaigns and those who have contributed to them. As our study shows, digital feminist activism is far more complex and nuanced than one might initially expect, and a variety of digital platforms are used in a multitude of ways, for many purposes. Furthermore, although it may be technologically easy for many groups to engage in digital feminist activism, there remain emotional, mental, or practical barriers that create different experiences, and legitimate some feminist voices, perspectives, and experiences over others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As with women and girls' interpretations of other forms of masculine sexual aggression, like catcalling, as evidence of attraction (Mendes et al., 2019), we argue that interpreting an uninvited dick pic as evidence that one is attractive to men and boys demonstrates internalisation of sexist, 'patriarchal ' norms of predatory masculinity (Bonilla et al., 2020).”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Mendes et al., 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contemporary Social Movements in a Hybrid Media Environment
Caren, N., Andrews, K. T., & Lu, T. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054627 · Cited by 108
Remixing misandry, manspreading, and dick pics: networked feminist humour on Tumblr
Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1450351 · Cited by 88
Self-citationRingrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., & Slane, A. (2022) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615 · Cited by 67
Self-citationHinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241284413 · Cited by 12
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001
- The paper
- Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001