The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drivers of national climate policy
Abstract
Patterns of national climate policy performance and their implications for the geopolitics of climate change are examined. An overview of levels of emissions performance across countries is first provided. Substantial changes in emissions trends over time are documented, notably with GHG emissions trajectories, which are shaped less and less by the developed/developing country divide. Various patterns of policy convergence and divergence in the types of policies states implement are then surveyed. Four broad types of explanation that may account for these trends are then explored: (1) variation in the institutional form of country-level governance regimes, (2) patterns of dependence on fossil fuel energy, (3) broad systemic differences among states (specifically in their population densities, carbon intensity, and per capita incomes, and (4) variations in the traditions of economic intervention by states. The article contributes to the growing body of work on comparative climate policy, and provides a first attempt at exploring the comparative politics of instrument choice. The analysis challenges the continued importance of a North–South divide for the future of climate policy, thus reinforcing a sense of the ‘new geopolitics’ of climate change. Some of the implications of the analysis for debates about the form of future international agreement on mitigation policy are also explored. Policy relevance The article contributes to the understanding of the variety of institutional conditions under which policy makers develop policy and thus the constraints and opportunities for the design of international agreements under these conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unruh, G. C. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7 · Cited by 3,304
The Regime Complex for Climate Change
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592710004068 · Cited by 2,047
Shi, A. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00223-9 · Cited by 671
Democracy and Environmental Degradation
LI, Q., & REUVENY, R. (2006) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.x · Cited by 495
Cited by
Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015 · Cited by 601
Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation
Eskander, S. M. S. U., & Fankhauser, S. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0831-z · Cited by 429
Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?
(2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108284646 · Cited by 426
Aklin, M., & Mildenberger, M. (2020) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00578 · Cited by 341
The political economy of decarbonisation: from green energy ‘race’ to green ‘division of labour’
Lachapelle, E., MacNeil, R., & Paterson, M. (2017) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1240669 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lachapelle, E., & Paterson, M.
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-571
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W2086977164
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drivers of national climate policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14693062.2013.811333
- The paper
- Lachapelle, E., & Paterson, M. (2013). Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.811333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.