The impact of the Tokyo Metropolitan Emissions Trading Scheme on reducing greenhouse gas emissions: findings from a facility-based study
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the Tokyo Metropolitan Emissions Trading Scheme (Tokyo ETS), Japan’s first emissions trading scheme with mandatory cap initiated by the government of Tokyo. Unlike trading schemes in other countries, the Tokyo ETS covers indirect emissions from the commercial sector. It is well known that a variety of market barriers impede full realization of energy efficiency opportunities, especially in the commercial sector. Experiences with the Tokyo ETS should therefore provide important lessons for the design of climate change mitigation policies, especially when targeting the commercial sector. The emissions from covered entities have been drastically reduced from those at the scheme’s outset, with an average 14% reduction as of the end of the first commitment period of five years (2010–2014) compared with 2009 levels. This paper shows that the Tokyo ETS alone did not cause these reductions; there were other drivers. Among them, the energy savings triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011 were crucial. The contribution of credit trading, in contrast, was limited since most of the covered entities reduced emissions by themselves. Through an investigation of official reports, an assessment of the emissions data from the covered entities compared to those of uncovered entities and in-depth interviews with firms covered by the scheme, this paper confirms that the main drivers of emissions reductions by covered entities were separate fr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results of studies on emissions trading markets outside Europe remain inconclusive, showing little impact or none.
“However, the results remain inconclusive, showing little impact (Arimura and Abe 2021) or even none (Wakabayashi and Kimura 2018).”
From The Impact of Carbon Pricing on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence From the European Union (2026) · cites this paper as Wakabayashi and Kimura 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses
Green, J. F. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
The Impact of Carbon Pricing on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence From the European Union
García, C. J., Herrero, B., & Morillas‐Jurado, F. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70324 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wakabayashi, M., & Kimura, O.
- Affiliations
- Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Wakabayashi, Masayo
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-02-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1028-1043
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W2792027006
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy Efficiency and Management
- Keywords
- emissions trading, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, indirect emissions, Great East Japan Earthquake, energy conservation, carbon price, climate change mitigation policy, covered entities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review