Cited by 94Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Peer assessment: judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks

Davies, Phil·2006·Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study into the quality of peer feedback provided by students within a computerised peer‐assessment environment. The study looks at the creation of a ‘feedback index’ that represents the quality of an essay based upon the feedback provided during a peer‐marking process and identifies a significant positive correlation between this index and the average marks produced for an essay. The data produced are analysed in an attempt to ascertain whether specific groups of students, based upon their ability in developing an essay within this subject area, in general tend to mark and/or comment on their peers either too generously or too critically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14703290500467566

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, P.
Affiliations
University of Glamorgan (GB)
Corresponding author
Davies, Phil
Venue
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Published
2006-02
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
69-82
ISSN
  • 1470-3297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-3300
OpenAlex
W2000405589
Cited by
94
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Innovations in Education and Teaching International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
peer assessment, peer feedback, peer marking, essay quality, student ability differences, academic writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review