Cited by 24EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningOnline and Blended LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of teacher communication in online collaborative language learning between a Chinese and an Australian school: a cautionary tale

Moloney, Robyn·2013·Language and Intercultural Communication

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed rapid growth in language learning within online collaborative learning projects constructed between educational institutions in different cultural and pedagogic contexts. This qualitative case study investigated the role of teacher communication in a short online project between language classes in secondary schools in Australia and China. Analysis of teacher interview data from the Australian school identifies, in the unequal participation across the two school contexts, that the core impacting factor was breakdown in teacher communication. This involved apparent conflict in pedagogic beliefs both across the two educational schema involved and also within the teacher's adaptation to her Australian context. This study provides evidence of the need to address both partners' pedagogic cultures and the development of new teacher skills, in the construction of a ‘middle ground’ in which online intercultural learning experience can be successful.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14708477.2013.776068

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021943.35739.1c · DOI
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), 2011, Shape of the Australian curriculum: Languages
  3. Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations (AFMLTA), 2005, Professional standards for accomplished teachers of languages and cultures
  4. 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Board of Studies, NSW, 2003, K–10 language syllabus: Chinese
  6. 10.2307/3587334 · DOI
  7. Burns A., 1992, Prospect, 7, 56
  8. Byram M., 2002, Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching. A practical introduction for teachers
  9. Chi T. R., 1989, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 109
  10. East M., 2010, New Zealand Language Teacher, 36, 11
  11. Felix U., 2003, Language learning online: Towards best practice
  12. Glesne C., 1992, On becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction
  13. Gu L. Y., 2002, Xunzhao Zhongjian didai [Searching for the Middle Ground]
  14. 10.1080/07908310608668755 · DOI
  15. Gunawardena C. N., 2003, Handbook of distance education, 753
  16. Harbon L., 2012, The next step: Introducing the languages and cultures network for Australian Universities. Selected Proceedings of the Inaugural LCNAU Colloquium
  17. Ho D. Y. F., 1994, Cross-cultural roots of minority child development
  18. 10.1080/07908310208666636 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0267190504000091 · DOI
  20. Leng H., 2005, Issues in Educational Research, 15, 17
  21. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00362.x · DOI
  22. Liddicoat A. J., 2003, Report on intercultural language learning
  23. 10.1093/elt/58.4.319 · DOI
  24. Lo Bianco J., 2009, Second languages and Australian schooling. Australian Education Review 54
  25. Moloney R., 2008, Babel, 42, 10
  26. Moloney R., 2012, Babel, 47, 14
  27. Morgan A.-M., 2010, Babel, 45, 26
  28. NALSSP, 2007, National Asian languages and studies in schools program. Asia Education Foundation
  29. 10.1080/14708470508668882 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/14708470508668882 · DOI · Paper page
  31. O'Dowd R., 2007, Online intercultural exchange: an introduction for foreign language teachers, 10.21832/9781847690104 · DOI
  32. O'Dowd, R. (2010).Plenary Speech. Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education?(pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. O'Dowd R., 2006, CALICO Journal, 23, 10.1558/cj.v23i3.623-642 · DOI
  34. Orton J., 2008, Chinese language education in Australian schools
  35. Orton J., 2011, Teaching and learning Chinese in global contexts, 151
  36. Richards J., 2001, PAC Journal, 1, 1
  37. Rogers E. M., 1995, Diffusion of innovations
  38. Ryan G. W., 2000, Handbook of qualitative research, 769
  39. Scarino A., 2009, Teaching and learning languages: A guide
  40. Scrimgeour A., 2009, Babel, 43, 35
  41. 10.1080/14675980500502321 · DOI
  42. Tsui A., 2009, Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education, 281
  43. 10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_02 · DOI
  44. Wilson B. G., 1996, Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design
  45. 10.1080/07908318.2010.545413 · DOI
  46. 10.1017/S0266078406002021 · DOI
  47. 10.1080/13598660701793392 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Moloney, R.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Moloney, Robyn
Venue
Language and Intercultural Communication
Published
2013-11
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
400-415
ISSN
  • 1470-8477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-759X
OpenAlex
W2015745376
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language and Intercultural Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
teacher communication, online collaborative learning, intercultural language learning, unequal participation, teacher adaptation, middle ground

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review