The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public value creation through collaborative innovation
Open accessAbstract
This article explores how public managers can use insights about public sector innovation and public value governance to make more than incremental progress in remedying society’s most pressing needs. After outlining the features of public innovation, it considers some traditional barriers to achieving it. It then considers the usefulness of the public value framework for managers seeking to design innovative solutions for complex problems, and examines the type of leadership that is likely to foster collaborative innovation and public value. It finishes by offering levers for achieving innovation by adopting design logics and practices associated with inclusive, experimentalist governance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems
Kramer, R., & Gray, B. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258026 · Cited by 2,683
The functions of social conflict
Coser, L. A. (1956) · Cited by 2,648
The Functions of Social Conflict.
Levy, M. J., & Coser, L. A. (1957) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088776 · Cited by 2,596
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x · Cited by 2,403
Self-citationThe entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-3359 · Cited by 2,297
Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress
(2001) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00248-8 · Cited by 2,285
Osborne, D. (1993) · Public Productivity & Management Review · doi:10.2307/3381012 · Cited by 2,273
Cited by
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Wang, C., Teo, T. S. H., & Janssen, M. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102401 · Cited by 161
Platform Government in the Era of Smart Technology
Kim, S., Andersen, K. N., & Lee, J. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13422 · Cited by 128
Collaborative innovation and human-machine networks
Kattel, R., Lember, V., & Tõnurist, P. (2020) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1645873 · Cited by 74
The contested nature of New Public Governance as a third governance model
van Gestel, N., & Ferlie, E. (2026) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2026.2645329 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J.
- Venue
- Public Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-25
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 655-669
- ISSN
- 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9037
- 1471-9045
- OpenAlex
- W2516013275
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 59.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public value creation through collaborative innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
- The paper
- Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
