Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In Pursuit of Inter-Agency Collaboration In The Public Sector: What is the contribution of theory and research?

Hudson, Bob, Hardy, Brian, Henwood, Melanie, Wistow, Gerald·1999·Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory

Abstract

Although long seen as desirable, inter-agency collaboration has remained conceptually elusive and difficult to achieve. Whilst recognising that there are other positions, this article takes the normative position that collaboration is generally a ‘good thing’. It brings together strands of theoretical, conceptual and empirical literature from diverse disciplines in ‘order to better understand inter-agency collaboration as a concept and as a process, This is developed into a sequentially structured framework capable of being customised to a range of organisational and policy contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14719039900000005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Hudson, B., Hardy, B., Henwood, M., & Wistow, G.
Venue
Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory
Published
1999-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
235-260
ISSN
  • 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1065
OpenAlex
W2073413315
Cited by
249
References
0
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Pursuit of Inter-Agency Collaboration In The Public Sector: What is the contribution of theory and research? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14719039900000005
The paper
Hudson, B., Hardy, B., Henwood, M., & Wistow, G. (1999). In Pursuit of Inter-Agency Collaboration In The Public Sector: What is the contribution of theory and research? Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719039900000005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.