Cited by 286Children's Rights and ParticipationGeography and Education MethodsHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought

What else? some more ways of thinking and doing ‘Children's Geographies’

Horton, John, Kraftl, Peter·2006·Children's Geographies

Abstract

‘Children's Geographies’ could do more. In this paper we present a succession of key ideas currently arising in and of new and emergent theoretical, philosophical and conceptual work in the Social Sciences. We invite reflection upon each of these ideas in turn, with a mind, specifically, to ‘Children's Geographies’. In so doing, we make two broad claims. First, that greater engagement with some or all of these ideas might prove useful, enabling, thought-provoking, profound, constructive, challenging, telling, or interesting to ‘Children's Geographers’. Second, that—particularly given the nature of its extant concerns and efforts— ‘Children's Geographies’ could do much more to speak back to (these) wider contemporary lines of thought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14733280600577459

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understandings of space as complex, always changing, as a verb are consistent with conceptualisations of teacher agency as an emergent phenomenon, something which teachers do, rather than possess and which are both dynamic and temporal.

    “These understandings of space as complex, always changing, as a verb (Horton & Kraftl, 2006) are consistent with conceptualisations of teacher agency as an emergent phenomenon, something which teachers do, rather than possess and which are both dynamic and temporal (Priestley et al., 2015).”
  • The continuous construction of space can be actively shaped by people, including children and young people, as well as adults.

    “The continuous construction of space can be actively shaped by people, including children and young people, as well as adults, as Horton and Kraftl (2006, p. 88) argue, 'children (and adults) are constantly creating, or co-creating their geographies.”
  • Space is understood in current geographical thinking as more than a location on a map or a place in the digital realm but instead, a complex context where relational and fluid agency is enacted.

    “Space is understood in current geographical thinking as more than a location on a map or a place in the digital realm but instead, a complex context where relational and fluid agency is enacted (Horton & Kraftl, 2006;Massey, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horton, J., & Kraftl, P.
Affiliations
University of Northampton (GB)
Venue
Children's Geographies
Published
2006-04
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
69-95
ISSN
  • 1473-3277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-3285
OpenAlex
W2093973336
Cited by
286
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
32.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children s Geographies (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Geography and Education Methods
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
Keywords
theoretical approaches, philosophical views, conceptual framework, children's places, children's space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review