Cited by 84Children's Rights and ParticipationParticipatory Visual Research MethodsYouth Education and Societal Dynamics

Involving young people as researchers: uncovering multiple power relations among youths

Open access
Schäfer, Nadine, Yarwood, Richard·2008·Children's Geographies

Abstract

In this paper, we address the issue of giving young people a voice by involving them as interviewers in the research process. While highlighting the beneficial outcomes and the empowering potential of this method, we critically discuss the assumption that peer-led interviews create less hierarchical power relations as no adult is involved. We thus caution against seeing this method as the ultimate solution to young people's marginalisation. Considering that participation is a form of power, we argue that it is essential to acknowledge and work with the power relations that characterise young people's everyday lives and that thus also affect the creation of a participatory arena with them. Power relations among young people, however, have been mainly neglected in previous research. The paper draws on a participatory research project conduced with young people (14–16 years old) in rural east-Germany that focuses on the complexity of young people's daily life experiences and perceptions of their future prospects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14733280801963003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another potential for research with children to be experienced as disempowering lies in the multiple-power relations among young people themselves which affect the research process, including peer group cultures and classroom dynamics that work against fairness and collegiality.

    “Another potential for research with children to be experienced as disempowering, and which has been given limited attention, lies in the multiple-power relations among young people themselves which affect the research process (Schäfer and Yarwood, 2008) including peer group cultures and classroom dynamics that work against fairness and collegiality (Todd, 2012).”

    From Child participatory research methods: Attempts to go ‘deeper’ (2017) · cites this paper as Schäfer and Yarwood, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schäfer, N., & Yarwood, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Schäfer, Nadine
Venue
Children's Geographies
Published
2008-05
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
121-135
ISSN
  • 1473-3277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-3285
OpenAlex
W2005877878
Cited by
84
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children s Geographies (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Keywords
youth participation, youth marginalization, participatory research, youth voice, youth empowerment, everyday experience, perceptions of the future, rural youth, East Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review