The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Companies and UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
Abstract
This article analyses the important connection between corporate longevity, social responsibility and intellectual property rights (IPR) assets in the context of sustainability. Society is demanding greater transparency of the footprint corporate entities leave on the planet as a result of how their business model is activated. The private sector response necessary to operate sustainably in the long term is critically examined specifically in connection with the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (SDG 9). SDG 9 aims to ‘Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation’. Certain characteristics of companies in the century club are contrasted with those of the younger MNEs with IP-reliant digital business models to illustrate the important connection between innovation, IP, sustainability and corporate longevity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, frugal innovation can help not only save energy and other material consumptions associated with the operation of the business, but also provide simple and affordable solutions to problems confronting the lives of those in poor communities by using limited resources efficiently (e.g., Brem & Wolfram, 2014;Denoncourt, 2020).”
From Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Denoncourt, 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ren, S., Cooke, F. L., Stahl, G. K., Fan, D., & Timming, A. R. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22169 · Cited by 148
Data governance & quality management—Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields
Bernardo, B. M. V., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Denoncourt, J.
- Affiliations
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Denoncourt, Janice
- ORCID
- Denoncourt, Janice
- Venue
- Journal of Corporate Law Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-30
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-235
- ISSN
- 1473-5970 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-8426
- OpenAlex
- W2970697657
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Corporate Law Studies (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Keywords
- SDG 9, sustainable development, intellectual property, corporate longevity, corporate social responsibility, multinational corporations, digital business models, innovation, sustainable industrial development, infrastructure resilience, sustainability reporting, corporate sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
