Cited by 0Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening: a review of post-procedure MRI outcomes

LeBlang, Suzanne, Mehta, Rashi I., D’haese, Pierre-François, Grinspan, Augusto, Sokolov, Amit, Frazzetta, Giulia·2026·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Focused ultrasound (FUS) blood-brain barrier opening (BBBo) is an incisionless technique that facilitates cerebral drug delivery by temporarily increasing BBB permeability. Clinical trials have shown that FUS produces reversible BBBo and is feasible in humans. There are currently no standardized imaging protocols for assessing the safety of FUS-BBBo, although MRI is commonly performed. AREAS COVERED: This structured narrative review summarizes neuroimaging techniques used to assess FUS-BBBo safety in clinical trials of participants with neurological disorders that reported post-procedural MRI findings. A search of PubMed from September 2014 to April 2026 was undertaken to identify clinical trials of FUS-BBBo (13 in patients with brain tumors and 16 in neurodegenerative diseases). EXPERT OPINION: Localized T2* hypointense signals and T2 hyperintense signals are relatively common after FUS-BBBo. While these findings have been thought to be related to transient microhemorrhage or edema, no consistent association has been found between such findings and clinically significant adverse events. Further work incorporating standardized post-FUS-BBBo MRI safety assessments is needed to clarify the biological significance of these signal alterations, and to determine whether they indicate a potential long-term safety concern, are a harmless finding associated with the BBBo procedure, or are associated with the underlying diseases and/or concomitant drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2026.2737272

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
LeBlang, S., Mehta, R. I., D’haese, P.-F., Grinspan, A., Sokolov, A., & Frazzetta, G.
Affiliations
  • Focused Ultrasound Foundation (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Insightec
  • Insightec LTD
  • Insightec EMEA
Corresponding author
Frazzetta, Giulia
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2026-10-01
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W7215089841
Cited by
0
References
5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Insightec
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
focused ultrasound, blood-brain barrier opening, transcranial ultrasound, microhemorrhages, cerebral edema, brain tumors, neurodegenerative diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review