Cited by 81Problem and Project Based LearningDesign Education and PracticeInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The problem of projects: understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL

Open access
Hanney, Roy, Savin-Baden, Maggi·2013·London Review of Education

Abstract

For many years there has been a sharp division between project-based learning, and problem-based learning, with the former adopting a more technical rationalist approach while the latter adopts a more Socratic or dialogic approach. This article argues that current notions of project-based learning are too narrow and that combining the two approaches will improve student engagement and criticality. This article begins by outlining the key differences between project-based, and problem-based learning, suggesting a new constellation. It then provides an exemplar in the form of a case study that sought to undertake such a combination, and reports on implications for practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14748460.2012.761816

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barnett, R. 1994. The limits of competence. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
  2. Conway, J., and P. Little. 2000. Adopting PBL as the preferred institutional approach to teaching and learning: Considerations and challenges. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 11, nos. 2/3: 11-26.
  3. Hodgson, C., and S. Cicmil. 2006. Are projects real? In Making projects critical, ed. C. Hodgson and S. Cicmil, 29-50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Savin-Baden, M. 2007b. Learning spaces. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
  5. Taylor, I. 1997. Developing learning in professional education. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 81

Metadata

Authors
Hanney, R., & Savin-Baden, M.
Affiliations
North China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Hanney, Roy
Venue
London Review of Education
Publisher
UCL Press
Published
2013
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1474-8460 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-8479
OpenAlex
W1997501858
Cited by
81
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
25.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • London Review of Education (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
project-based learning, problem-based learning, student engagement, criticality, dialogic learning, rationalism, university teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The problem of projects: understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14748460.2012.761816
The paper
Hanney, R., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. London Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2012.761816