Can the Saree Speak? Exploring Tradition, Heritage and Beyond
Abstract
The present study interrogates the multiple meanings of cultural heritage in UNESCO instruments, emphasizing its distinction from—yet partial convergence with—cultural property. Tracing the saree’s historical trajectory—from ancient handloom traditions to its modern design iterations—the analysis shows how the saree is not a simple clothing but a contested cultural terrain where global heritage narratives intersect with indigenous artisan knowledge, gendered subjectivities, and contemporary political dynamics. Employing an interdisciplinary approach—spanning epistemology, gender studies, societal analysis, and critiques of modernity—the present study confronts the core issues of cultural appropriation, intellectual property vulnerabilities, and indigenous rights in South Asian material culture. By analyzing the metamorphosis of the garment into a potent signifier of identity, belonging, and cultural heritage within South Asian fashion, the research advances scholarship on decolonizing fashion, sustainable heritage preservation, and gendered cultural politics in the region. The present study examines the ways in which the concept of nationhood is articulated and manifested in linguistic forms, clothing, signifiers, textual elements and rhetorical devices also probes into the connections between the post-2014 surge in Hindu nationalism and the saree’s aesthetic refiguration in modern India.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
‘Cultural Heritage’ or ‘Cultural Property’?
Prott, L. V., & O’Keefe, P. J. (1992) · International Journal of Cultural Property · doi:10.1017/s094073919200033x · Cited by 210 · see citing works
The Indian Fashion Industry and Traditional Indian Crafts
Khaire, M. V. (2011) · The Business History Review · doi:10.1017/s0007680511000419 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Weaves and Voices: Tracing the Journey of the Indian Saree
Chatterjee, A. (2022) · TEXTILE · doi:10.1080/14759756.2022.2051821 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationCultural Heritage Care and Management
Lizama, S. C. (2018) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216405382 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yadav, C., & Saha, A. (2026) · TEXTILE · doi:10.1080/14759756.2026.2750387
- Authors
- Chatterjee, A.
- Corresponding author
- Chatterjee, Anindita
- ORCID
- Chatterjee, Anindita
- Venue
- TEXTILE
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-03-31
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-799
- ISSN
- 1475-9756 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8350
- OpenAlex
- W7144192843
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TEXTILE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Identity and Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Keywords
- Sari, cultural heritage, cultural property, cultural appropriation, intellectual property, indigenous rights, sustainable heritage preservation, nationhood, Hindu nationalism, identity and belonging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review