Cited by 39Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Criteria for assigning cause of death for stillbirths and neonatal deaths in research studies in low-middle income countries

Open access
Goldenberg, Robert L., Muhe, Lulu, Saleem, Sarah, Dhaded, Sangappa, Goudar, Shivaprasad S., Patterson, Janna, Nigussie, Assaye, McClure, Elizabeth M.·2019·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

Accurate knowledge regarding cause of death (COD) for stillbirths and neonatal deaths is crucial, especially in low-income countries, in order for public health and medical officials to choose appropriate interventions likely to reduce these deaths. To date, many of the COD studies in these areas have relied only on obstetric or neonatal clinical information and the determination of COD is likely to be inaccurate. Information related to infectious COD is especially lacking. Thus, without more sophisticated testing, data as currently collected only provide a very weak approximation of the COD and may well lead to adoption of interventions of limited usefulness. In this commentary, we propose recommendations regarding the type of data needed to determine with reasonable accuracy the COD for stillbirths and neonatal deaths in low-resource settings. Using these data, and a method to determine the degree of certainty, we then propose definitions for the most common COD. Our goal is to reduce subjectivity and provide more specificity for the tests used in existing classification systems so that the methodology of COD determination is transparent and able to be replicated over time and from location to location.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14767058.2017.1419177

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinician-assigned cause of death may be inaccurate for several reasons, including lack of diagnostic tools such as autopsies, placental histology, X-rays, and lack of routine bacterial cultures.

    “Clinician-assigned cause of death, which is the most common method used, may be inaccurate for several reasons, including lack of diagnostic tools such as autopsies, placental histology, X-rays, as well as lack of routine bacterial cultures [6, 7].”

    From Neonatal deaths in rural Karnataka, India 2014–2018: a prospective population-based observational study in a low-resource setting (2020) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that sparse clinical data and the lack of cultures, chest X-rays, autopsies, and placental histology can prevent accurate cause-of-death determination in low-resource settings. It also notes that clinicians can reach different conclusions. The paper does not establish the citing sentence’s additional assertion that clinician assignment is the most common method used. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McClure EM, Garces A, Saleem S, et al. Probable causes of stillbirth in low-and middle-income coun- tries using a prospectively defined classification sys- tem. BJOG. 2018;125(2):131-138.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, R. L., Muhe, L., Saleem, S., Dhaded, S., Goudar, S. S., Patterson, J., Nigussie, A., & McClure, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
  • Gates Foundation (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Goldenberg, Robert L.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2018-08-23
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1915-1923
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2888163335
Cited by
39
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
causes of death, stillbirth, neonatal death, low-middle income countries, resource-limited settings, infectious disease mortality, classification systems, diagnostic testing, data quality, research methodology
MeSH terms
Autopsy, Cause of Death, Developing Countries, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Stillbirth, Perinatal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review