‘I call it the hero complex’ – Critical considerations of power and privilege and seeking to be an agent of change in qualitative researchers’ experiences
Open accessAbstract
There is a relative paucity of studies specifically exploring the experiences of qualitative researchers undertaking research in socially sensitive areas or with marginalised groups. This paper reports some of the findings of a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of 10 participant researchers. The findings of this study suggest that participant researchers are cognisant of issues of power and privilege in conducting their research. They also illustrate the motivation to enact change via the research findings. However, they demonstrate the complexities of power, privilege and change in the research process and how these concepts can be related to researcher guilt. The study shows that experience can act as a buffer in the qualitative research process but that further work in researcher resilience is required. Participant researchers suggest the need for more honest and open discussions around foundational principles of qualitative research. They suggest further development of cross-institutional spaces for these discussions to take place. However, the paper also illustrates the necessity to consider issues of power, privilege and research as social change at individual, institutional and systemic levels.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Delmont, S., & Mason, J. (1997) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591613 · Cited by 4,245 · see citing works
Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology
Willig, C. (2001) · Cited by 3,012 · see citing works
Qualitative Methods in Psychology : A Research Guide
Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (2011) · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Power Relations in Qualitative Research
Karnieli‐Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2008) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732308329306 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v11.30996 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Collecting Sensitive Data: The Impact on Researchers
Johnson, B., & Clarke, J. M. (2003) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732302250340 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Being a Qualitative Researcher
Holloway, I., & Biley, F. C. (2011) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732310395607 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The double arrow: How qualitative social work researchers use reflexivity
Probst, B., & Berenson, L. (2014) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/1473325013506248 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Resourcing Scholar-Activism: Collaboration, Transformation, and the Production of Knowledge
Derickson, K. D., & Routledge, P. (2014) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1080/00330124.2014.883958 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Coles, J., Astbury, J., Dartnall, E., & Limjerwala, S. (2014) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801213520578 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Fahie, D. (2014) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940691401300108 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Watermeyer, R. (2012) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709490 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Research funder required research partnerships: a qualitative inquiry
Sibbald, S. L., Tetroe, J., & Graham, I. D. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0176-y · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Drake, D. H., & Harvey, J. (2013) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.769702 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2005) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687590500059077 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Doing research in immigration removal centres: Ethics, emotions and impact
Bosworth, M., & Këllezi, B. (2016) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895816646151 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Researching Distressing Topics
Jackson, S., Backett-Milburn, K. C., & Newall, E. (2013) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013490705 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Watermeyer, R., & Hedgecoe, A. M. (2016) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1170885 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The Vulnerable Researcher: Some Unanticipated Challenges of Doctoral Fieldwork
Ballamingie, P., & Johnson, S. (2014) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1084 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Emotional Labor in Critical Ethnographic Work
McQueeney, K. B., & Lavelle, K. M. (2015) · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography · doi:10.1177/0891241615602310 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
O’Connor, D., & O'Neill, B. (2004) · Journal of Teaching in Social Work · doi:10.1300/j067v24n03_02 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Fear of offending: disclosing researcher discomfort when engaging in analysis
Hoskins, M. L., & Stoltz, J. (2005) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794105048658 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Researcher self-care in organizational ethnography
Vincett, J. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Ethnography · doi:10.1108/joe-09-2017-0041 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Ethical Concerns in Research on Human Trafficking
(2015) · Studies of organized crime · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21521-1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“We Are Alone in the House”: A Case Study Addressing Researcher Safety and Risk
Parker, N., & O’Reilly, M. J. (2013) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.647261 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Vulnerability and resilience: critical reflexivity in gendered violence research
Pio, E., & Singh, S. (2015) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1089166 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Interrogating power: the case of arts and mental health in community projects
Lawthom, R., Sixsmith, J., & Kagan, C. M. (2007) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.932 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Risk for Researchers Studying Social Deviance or Criminal Behavior
Brougham, P. L., & Uttley, C. M. (2017) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci6040130 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Kennedy, F., Hicks, B., & Yarker, J. (2013) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.12135 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Researcher’s guilt: confessions from the darker side of ethnographic consumer research
Mamali, E. (2018) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2018.1474109 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strunel, A.-M., & Cordoba, S. (2025) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2025.2505460 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Humour as a Boundary-Breaker in Social Work Practice
Blundell, P. (2023) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2023.2204448 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Woodend, J., & Arthur, N. M. (2022) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6067 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Blakley, L. (2022) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2022.2033397 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hunt, D. F. (2026) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2026.2619251 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tragedy in organizational ethnography: radical critique and transformative experience
Karlsson, M. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Ethnography · doi:10.1108/joe-03-2025-0026
Benjeddi, H., Dittborn, M., Hirst, M., Terzidis, A., van der Kuip, M., Gruppen, M. P., & Brierley, J. (2026) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-025-01356-5
MENTORING FOR INCLUSION IN STEM: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SURVEY FINDINGS
West, T., Smith, C. A., & Steele, C. (2026) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2026058864
Wang, C. J. (2026) · Migration Studies · doi:10.1093/migration/mnag048
- Authors
- Oakley, L., Fenge, L.-A., & Taylor, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Chester (GB)
- Bournemouth University (GB)
- Independent Researcher, Cheshire without Abuse
- Corresponding author
- Oakley, Lisa
- Venue
- Qualitative Research in Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-30
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-610
- ISSN
- 1478-0887 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-0895
- OpenAlex
- W3004200717
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Qualitative Research in Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
- ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bournemouth University (Pump Prime Funding)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- power and privilege, researcher experience, marginalised groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
