Cited by 51Quality and Supply ManagementManagement Systems and Quality ImprovementHealthcare Quality and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated approach between Lean and customer feedback tools: An empirical study in the public sector

Di Pietro, Laura, Mugion, Roberta Guglielmetti, Renzi, Maria Francesca·2013·Total Quality Management & Business Excellence

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to verify that a mixed approach that integrates Lean principles and customer feedback tools is effective and critical for improving performance. This article draws upon the theory of G. Mazur, which states, ‘Lean without customer satisfaction does not equal success’ (Mazur, 2009, QFD Institute). The current study verifies whether this idea is applicable to the public sector. The study focuses on integrating the waste management proposed by the Lean approach and the customer focus proposed by total quality management. The combination of these practices through the use of suitable tools may represent a key factor in maximising results and optimising performance despite the current economic recession. This paper presents the methodology and results of a Kaizen event in an Italian public office in which both of these tools were adopted. A value stream map depicting current and future states was designed to identify areas of improvement. The citizen relationship office was selected as the context for the Kaizen event. Following this event, Lean tools were implemented to identify and reduce wastes, and customer feedback tools were adopted to analyse citizens' opinions. This study determined that implementing a Kaizen event programme in the public sector requires the adoption of a holistic approach and a consideration of the integration between internal and external aspects of public service functions. Lean and customer feedback tools have to be integra…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14783363.2013.791106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Atkinson C., 2008, International Journal of Business and Management, 3, 3
  2. Bicheno J., 2004, The new Lean toolbox: Towards fast, flexible flow
  3. Bromage N., 2000, Managing Accounting, 78, 30
  4. Chapman C. D., 2005, Quality Progress, 38, 27
  5. Dennis P., 2002, Lean production simplified: A plain language guide to the world's most powerful production system
  6. 10.1080/00131880500498560 · DOI
  7. 10.1108/09596119810199318 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00004-4 · DOI
  9. Grönroos C., 2000, Service management and marketing. A customer relationship management approach
  10. Guglielmetti R., 2012, TQM & Business Excellence
  11. 10.1108/09604529510796485 · DOI
  12. Ohno T., 1988, Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production
  13. Radnor Z., 2008, Public Money & Management, 28, 13
  14. Seddon J., 2008, Public Money and Management, 28, 7
  15. 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1080/14783363.2011.637777 · DOI
  17. 10.1108/09604529810235123 · DOI
  18. Womack J. P., 1990, The machine that changed the world: The story of Lean production
  19. Zeldis N., 1988, Management Review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Di Pietro, L., Mugion, R. G., & Renzi, M. F.
Affiliations
Roma Tre University (IT)
Venue
Total Quality Management & Business Excellence
Published
2013-08
Volume
24
Issue
7-8
Pages
899-917
ISSN
  • 1478-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-3371
OpenAlex
W2047725564
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Total Quality Management & Business Excellence (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
lean manufacturing, customer feedback, public sector, Kaizen, value stream mapping, waste reduction, total quality management, customer satisfaction, citizen services, public service performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review