Cited by 129Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sources and sinks of clay minerals on Mars

Milliken, Ralph E., Bish, David L.·2010·Philosophical Magazine

Abstract

The recent identification of clay minerals on the Martian surface using visible–near infrared reflectance spectroscopy has had a profound effect on our view of aqueous alteration on Mars. Smectite, chlorite, kaolin group, and serpentine group minerals have been detected using the CRISM and OMEGA spectrometers, with Fe/Mg-smectite and chlorite varieties being the dominant types discovered throughout the ancient crust. Aqueous, eolian, and impact processes have transported and recycled some of these clays such that their current locations may not accurately reflect their formation environments. However, detrital clays could prove useful for constraining transport pathways and sediment provenance. Here we discuss the impact craters and channels that comprise the Uzboi–Ladon–Morava system, including Holden, Eberswalde, and Ladon craters, which represents a large-scale sediment sink for clay minerals derived from the surrounding Noachian crust. This system contains thick deposits of clay mineral-bearing strata that likely record a wide range of alluvial, fluvial, lacustrine, and eolian processes that provide direct insight into the Martian clay cycle. Broad concepts of sediment sources, sinks, and sediment transport paths can be outlined using orbital data, but future in situ exploration of the Martian sedimentary rock record will be necessary to distinguish fully between detrital and authigenic clay minerals, and thus to determine environmental conditions and transitions on ancient Mars.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14786430903575132

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Wray JJ, 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L12202
  2. Murchie SL, 2009, J. Geophys. Res., 114, E00D06
  3. Boothroyd JC, 1983, GSA Abstracts and Programs, 15, 530
  4. Moore JM, 2005, J. Geophys. Res., 110, E04005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Milliken, R. E., & Bish, D. L.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Milliken, Ralph E.
Venue
Philosophical Magazine
Published
2010-04-09
Volume
90
Issue
17-18
Pages
2293-2308
ISSN
  • 1478-6433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6435
  • 1478-6443
OpenAlex
W1992732141
Cited by
129
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
clay minerals, Mars, aqueous alteration, sediment sources and sinks, sediment transport, detrital clay, authigenic clay minerals, impact craters, channels, sediment provenance, aeolian processes, lake sediments, fluvial deposits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review