Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 627

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Poole-Frenkel conduction in amorphous solids

Hill, Robert M.·1971·Philosophical Magazine

Abstract

The nature of the electrical conduction process in amorphous solids, using as a basis the ionization of local defects by an applied field, is investigated. It is shown that the Poole-Frenkel effect is a limiting case of a more general analysis that can be extended to cover the experimentally available range of field stress and temperature. At low temperature conduction is by tunnelling emission out of the defects into the quasi-conduction band of the host material whereas at high temperatures thermal emission becomes dominant. Between the two regions a thermal-field emission process has been identified with the characteristic of ln J ∝ T −⅓.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14786437108216365

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 627

Metadata

Authors
Hill, R. M.
Venue
Philosophical Magazine
Published
1971-01
Volume
23
Issue
181
Pages
59-86
ISSN
0031-8086 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081641877
Cited by
627
References
0
FWCI
36.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poole-Frenkel conduction in amorphous solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14786437108216365
The paper
Hill, R. M. (1971). Poole-Frenkel conduction in amorphous solids. Philosophical Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786437108216365

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.