The DOI matches its Crossref record.
XVII. New method of determining the thermal conductibility of bodies
Abstract
(1863). XVII. New method of determining the thermal conductibility of bodies. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science: Vol. 25, No. 166, pp. 130-142.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pulsed power technique is in principle very close to Angstrom's method in terms of the heating method, but the heat sink temperature is slowly varying during the measurement.
“This technique is in principle very close to the Angstrom's method [39,40] in terms of the heating method.But the difference is that the heat sink temperature of this technique is slowly varying during the measurement.”
From Measurement Techniques for Thermal Conductivity and Interfacial Thermal Conductance of Bulk and Thin Film Materials (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Act. Reg. Soc. Scient. Upsala, 211
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermal conductivity of amorphous solids above the plateau
Cahill, D. G., & Pohl, R. O. (1987) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.35.4067 · Cited by 813
Zhao, D., Qian, X., Gu, X., Jajja, S. A., & Yang, R. (2016) · Journal of Electronic Packaging · doi:10.1115/1.4034605 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Angström, A. J.
- Venue
- The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1863-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 166
- Pages
- 130-142
- ISSN
- 1941-5982
- 1941-5990
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
