CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What Sherlock sorely missed: the EVA technology for cultural heritage exploration

Righetti, Pier Giorgio, Zilberstein, Gleb, D’Amato, Alfonsina·2019·Expert Review of Proteomics
DOI 10.1080/14789450.2019.1624164
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction : Capture of proteins and metabolites from Cultural Heritage (paintings, manuscripts, parchment etc.) has been done in the past via surface scraping and erasing, a method discouraged. The EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) method consists of a plastic polymer in which strong cation and anion resins, admixed with C 8 and/or C 18 , are embedded. Areas covered : We review here the findings on different items stored in public libraries and archives: (a) the original manuscript of the novel Master y Margarita by Bulgakov; (b) the death registries of the lazaretto in the 1630 Milano plague; (c) the shirt worn by A. Chekhov in his death bed; (d) Kepler's script on Hipparchus (in St. Petersburg National Archives); (e) the Memoirs of G. Casanova. Expert opinion : The technique here surveyed appears to be a unique tool enabling exploration of any document stored in public archives, museum and private collections without damaging or contaminating the items under analysis. The amounts harvested from any surface are very minute, yet sufficient for analysis via advanced mass spectrometry instrumentation, thus permitting the identification of all captured material. It is hoped that the present review will stimulate the scientific community to adopt it for projects pertaining to Cultural Heritage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14789450.2019.1624164

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applied polymer discs have been explored as a potential route to identifying proteinaceous components with minimal damage to artworks, manuscripts, and other cultural heritage objects.

    “To artworks, manuscripts, and other cultural heritage objects, applied polymer discs have also been explored as a potential route to identifying proteinaceous components with minimal damage”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [168]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1179/sic.1971.017 · DOI
  2. Higgitt C, 2005, Natl Gallery Tech Bull, 26, 88
  3. 10.1021/ac051181w · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s00216-008-2041-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00216-009-3183-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s12038-010-0001-y · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00216-010-4308-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00216-010-4378-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00216-013-7045-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s12038-013-9321-z · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.058 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.saa.2016.02.043 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.09.021 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1512264112 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nature14249 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03722 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.03.033 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.11.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.10.019 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/pmic.201700447 · DOI
  21. Grandi G. Genomics, proteomics and vaccines. Chichester: Wiley; 2004. p. XI–XVII. · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.11.028 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/pmic.201400361 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980520)58:4<408::AID-BIT8>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  25. 10.1111/arcm.12284 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195920 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/elps.201800505 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00037 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1021/pr800193y · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.051 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.03.004 · DOI
  32. Boschetti E, 2012, Adv Chromatogr, 50, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Righetti, P. G., Zilberstein, G., & D’Amato, A.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering ‘‘Giulio Natta’’, Milano, Italy
  • Spectrophon Ltd, Rehovot, Israel
  • Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Venue
Expert Review of Proteomics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
533-542
ISSN
  • 1478-9450
  • 1744-8387
DOI
10.1080/14789450.2019.1624164
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en
Funders
not funded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review