Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Animal origin of 13th-century uterine vellum revealed using noninvasive peptide fingerprinting

Fiddyment, Sarah, Holsinger, Bruce, Ruzzier, Chiara, Devine, Alexander, Binois, Annelise, Albarella, Umberto, Fischer, Roman, Nichols, Emma, Curtis, Antoinette, Cheese, Edward, Teasdale, Matthew D., Checkley-Scott, Caroline, Milner, Stephen J., Rudy, Kathryn M., Johnson, Eric J., Vnouček, Jiří, Garrison, Mary, McGrory, Simon, Bradley, Daniel G., Collins, Matthew J.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: This study reports the first use, to our knowledge, of triboelectric extraction of protein from parchment. The method is noninvasive and requires no specialist equipment or storage. Samples can be collected without the need to transport the artifacts; instead, researchers can sample when and where possible and analyze when required. The level of access we have achieved highlights the importance of this technique. For this study, we have extracted proteins from 513 parchment samples, used to resolve the long-standing question of the origin of “uterine vellum.” We find no evidence of unexpected species, such as rabbit or squirrel. We suggest that uterine vellum was often an achievement of technological production using available resources, and would not have demanded unsustainable agricultural practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1512264112

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through analysis of parchment, ZooMS is revealing temporal and geographic differences in use of animals in medieval economies.

    “Through the analysis of another substrate, ZooMS is also revealing temporal and geographic differences in the use of animals in medieval economies (52–54).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

  • ZooMS is typically applied to fragmented or morphologically nondiagnostic bone fragments and has also been applied to parchments, ivory, eggshell, combs, and leather objects.

    “For archeological questions, this analysis not only is typically applied to fragmented or morphologically nondiagnostic bone fragments but also has been applied to a range of other archeological material culture, including parchments (52–54), ivory (55), eggshell (19, 22), combs (56), and leather objects (57).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Fiddyment et al. developed and applied minimally invasive techniques to study parchments by gently rubbing parchments with an eraser and extracting collagen proteins from the eraser shavings.

    “Fiddyment et al. (53) developed and applied minimally invasive techniques to study parchments (manuscripts) made of animal skin by gently rubbing parchments with an eraser, which pulls off loose collagen fibers, and extracting collagen proteins from the eraser shavings.”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. G Pollard, Notes on the size of the sheet. The Library: Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 4, 105–137 (1941). · DOI
  2. D Thompson The Materials and Techniques of Medieval Painting (Dover, New York, 1956).
  3. C De Hamel Scribes and Illuminators (Univ of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1992).
  4. C Clarkson, Rediscovering parchment: The nature of the beast. The Paper Conservator 16, 5–26 (1992). · DOI
  5. M Clarke, The archaeology of the book: Formulating analytical research questions. E-Conservation Journal 2, 10–16 (2014). · DOI
  6. C Ruzzier, The miniaturisation of Bible manuscripts in the thirteenth century. A comparative study. Form and Function in the Late Medieval Bible, eds L Light, E Poleg (Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands and Boston), pp. 105–125 (2013). · DOI
  7. M Dove The Blackwell Companion to the Bible and Culture, ed JFA Sawyer (Wiley, New York, 2012).
  8. L Light, The Bible and the individual: The thirteenth century Paris Bible. The Practice of the Bible in the Middle Ages: Production, Reception, and Performance in Western Christianity, eds S Boynton, DJ Reilly (Columbia University Press, New York), pp. 228–246 (2011).
  9. F Juchauld P Bonnenberger A Komenda Identification de l’espèce animale des cuirs de reliure et des parchemins. Matériaux Du Livre Médiéval eds M. Zerdoun Bat-Yehouda C Bourlet C (Brepols Turnhout Belgium) pp 13–28. French. (2010). · DOI
  10. ML Ryder, Parchment—its history, manufacture and composition. J Soc Arch 2, 391–399 (1960). · DOI
  11. L Toniolo, A D’Amato, R Saccenti, D Gulotta, PG Righetti, The Silk Road, Marco Polo, a Bible and its proteome: A detective story. J Proteomics 75, 3365–3373 (2012). · DOI
  12. DP Kirby, M Buckley, E Promise, SA Trauger, TR Holdcraft, Identification of collagen-based materials in cultural heritage. Analyst (Lond) 138, 4849–4858 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  13. MD Teasdale, , Paging through history: Parchment as a reservoir of ancient DNA for next generation sequencing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370, 20130379 (2015). · DOI
  14. MA Bower, MG Campana, C Checkley‐Scott, B Knight, CJ Howe, The potential for extraction and exploitation of DNA from parchment: A review of the opportunities and hurdles. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 33, 1–11 (2010). · DOI
  15. MG Campana, , A flock of sheep, goats and cattle: Ancient DNA analysis reveals complexities of historical parchment manufacture. J Archaeol Sci 37, 1317–1325 (2010). · DOI
  16. J Burger, S Hummel, B Herrmann, Palaeogenetics and cultural heritage. Species determination and STR-genotyping from ancient DNA in art and artefacts. Thermochim Acta 365, 141–146 (2000). · DOI
  17. L Light The Early Medieval Bible. Its Production, Decoration, and Use, ed R Gameson (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994).
  18. L Light, R Marsden, EA Matter, The thirteenth century and the Paris Bible. The New Cambridge History of the Bible, eds R Marsden, EA Matter (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 380–391 (2012). · DOI
  19. RJ Forbes Fibres and Fabrics of Antiquity: Washing, Bleaching, Fulling and Felting; Dyes and Dyeing; Spinning, Sewing, Basketry and Weaving; Weaving and Looms; Fabrics and Weavers (Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1955).
  20. U Albarella, Tanners, tawyers, horn working and the mystery of the missing goat. The Environmental Archaeology of Industry, eds P Murphy, PEJ Wiltshire (Oxbow Books, Oxford), pp. 71–86 (2003).
  21. E Pascua, From forest to farm and town: Domestic animals from ca. 1000 to ca. 1450. A Cultural History of Animals in the Medieval Age, ed B Resl (Berg, Oxford), pp. 81–102 (2009).
  22. S Magrini, Production and use of Latin Bible manuscripts in Italy during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Manuscripta 51, 209–257 (2007). · DOI
  23. F Vallat Les Bøeufs Malades de la Peste la Peste Bovine en France et en Europe XVIIIe-XIXe Siècle (Presses universitaires de Rennes Rennes France). (2009). · DOI
  24. A Binois, Excavating the history of ancient veterinary practices. Vet Rec 176, 564–569 (2015). · DOI
  25. RA Banegas López, Consumption of meat in Western European cities during the late middle ages: A comparative study. Food and History 8, 63–86 (2010). · DOI
  26. B Clavel, L’animal dans l’alimentation médiévale et moderne en France du Nord (XIIIe-XVIIe siècles). Rev Med Picardie 19, 9–204, French. (2001).
  27. K Johansen, ML Petersen Making a Replica of the Treaty of Kiel (The Royal Library of Copenhagen and The Norwegian Parliament Archives, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Oslo, Norway, 2015).
  28. U Albarella, Size, power, wool and veal: Zooarchaeological evidence for late medieval innovations. Environment and Subsistence in Medieval Europe, eds G De Boe, F Verhaeghe (Institute for the Archaeological Heritage of Flanders, Bruges, Belgium), pp. 19–30 (1997).
  29. C Dyer, Alternative agriculture: Goats in medieval England. People, Landscape and Alternative Agriculture, eds RW Hoyle, J Thirsk (British Agricultural History Society, Exeter, UK), pp. 20–38 (2004).
  30. U Albarella, Meat production and consumption in town and country. Town and Country in the Middle Ages: Contrasts, Contacts, and Interactions 1100–1500, eds K Giles, C Dyer (Maney, Leeds, UK), pp. 131–148 (2005).
  31. C Minniti, Economia e alimentazione nel Lazio medievale: nuovi dati dalle evidenze archeozoologiche. Archeologia Medievale 36, 275–283, Italian. (2009).
  32. C Corbino “Dall’allevamento alle mense” la Toscana tra il XIII e la prima metà del XV secolo. Analisi archeozoologiche. PhD dissertation (Universita degli Studi di Siena Siena Italy). Italian. (2009).
  33. P Baker, G Clark, Archaeozoological evidence for medieval Italy: A critical review of the present state of research. Archeologia Medievale 20, 45–78 (1993).
  34. R Hall Sniglets (snig’lit): Any Word That Doesn’t Appear in the Dictionary, But Should (Macmillan, New York, 1984).
  35. M Strohalm, D Kavan, P Novák, M Volný, V Havlícek, mMass 3: A cross-platform software environment for precise analysis of mass spectrometric data. Anal Chem 82, 4648–4651 (2010). · DOI
  36. M Buckley, M Collins, J Thomas-Oates, JC Wilson, Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 23, 3843–3854 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  37. M Buckley, , Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide. J Archaeol Sci 37, 13–20 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  38. A Možir, IK Cigić, M Marinšek, M Strlič, Material properties of historic parchment: A reference collection survey. Stud Conserv 59, 136–149 (2014). · DOI
  39. W Horman Vulgaria Viri Doctissimi Guil. Hormani (Richard Pynson, London, 1519).
  40. PK Mays, JE Bishop, GJ Laurent, Age-related changes in the proportion of types I and III collagen. Mech Ageing Dev 45, 203–212 (1988). · DOI
  41. H Kitchen, I Brett, Embryonic and fetal hemoglobin in animals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 241, 653–671 (1974). · DOI
  42. LØ Brandt, , Species identification of archaeological skin objects from Danish bogs: Comparison between mass spectrometry-based peptide sequencing and microscopy-based methods. PLoS One 9, e106875 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  43. RM Grimes, CW Duncan, CA Lassiter, Bovine fetal hemoglobin. I. Postnatal persistence and relation to adult hemoglobins. J Dairy Sci 41, 1527–1533 (1958). · DOI
  44. CS Breathnach, Foetal and neonatal haemoglobins in sheep and goats. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 49, 277–289 (1964).
  45. R Fischer, BM Kessler, Gel-aided sample preparation (GASP)--a simplified method for gel-assisted proteomic sample generation from protein extracts and intact cells. Proteomics 15, 1224–1229 (2015). · DOI
  46. DY Yang, B Eng, JS Waye, JC Dudar, SR Saunders, Technical note: Improved DNA extraction from ancient bones using silica-based spin columns. Am J Phys Anthropol 105, 539–543 (1998). · DOI
  47. M Meyer, M Kircher, Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010, db.prot5448 (2010). · DOI
  48. R Cazelles, La population de Paris avant la peste noire. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 110, 539–550, French. (1966).
  49. M Mollat, Notes sur la mortalité à Paris au temps de la Peste Noite d'après les comptes de l'oeuvre de Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois. Études Sur L'économie et La Société de l'Occident Médiéval XIIe-XIVe Siècle, ed M Mollat (Variorum Reprints, London), pp. 505–527 (1977).
  50. B Laurioux Le règne de Taillevent: livres et pratiques culinaires à la fin du Moyen age (Publications de la Sorbonne Paris). French. (1997). · DOI
  51. MM Postan Essays on Medieval Agriculture and General Problems of the Medieval Economy (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fiddyment, S., Holsinger, B., Ruzzier, C., Devine, A., Binois, A., Albarella, U., Fischer, R., Nichols, E., Curtis, A., Cheese, E., Teasdale, M. D., Checkley-Scott, C., Milner, S. J., Rudy, K. M., Johnson, E. J., Vnouček, J., Garrison, M., McGrory, S., Bradley, D. G., & Collins, M. J.
Affiliations
  • BioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;
  • Department of English, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4121;
  • Institut de recherche Religions, spiritualités, cultures, sociétés, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium;
  • Department of English/Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19014;
  • UMR 7041 Archéologie et Sciences de l'Antiquité (ArScAn), Archéologies environnementales, Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, F-92023 Nanterre Cedex, France;
  • Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4ET, United Kingdom;
  • Target Discovery Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom;
  • Department of Conservation, Cambridge University Library, Cambridge CB3 9DR, United Kingdom;
  • Collection Care, Norfolk Record Office, Norwich NR1 2DQ, United Kingdom;
  • Department of Manuscripts and Printed Books, The Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge CB2 1RB, United Kingdom;
  • Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland;
  • Collection Care, The University of Manchester Library, The John Rylands Library, Manchester M3 3EH, United Kingdom;
  • Department of Italian, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom;
  • School of Art History, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, United Kingdom;
  • Rare Books & Manuscripts Library, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210;
  • Department of Preservation, The Royal Library, DK-1016 København K, Denmark;
  • Department of History, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
112
Issue
49
Pages
15066-15071
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
168
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • European Commission (299101-PALIMPSEST)
  • British Academy (Postdoctoral Fellowship Funding)
  • EC | European Research Council (295729-CodeX)
  • University Of Manchester (Seedcorn grant)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review