Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LEARNERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF THE DEFINITIONS AND HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF QUADRILATERALS: TOWARDS A THEORETICAL FRAMING

Fujita, Taro, Jones, Keith·2007·Research in Mathematics Education
DOI 10.1080/14794800008520167
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Defining and classifying quadrilaterals, though an established component of the school mathematics curriculum, appears to be a difficult topic for many learners. The reasons for such difficulties relate to the complexities in learning to analyse the attributes of different quadrilaterals and to distinguish between critical and non-critical aspects. Such learning, if it is to be effective, requires logical deduction, together with suitable interactions between concepts and images. This paper reports on an analysis of data from a total of 263 learners. The main purpose of the paper is to present a theoretical framing that is intended to inform further studies of this important topic within mathematics education research. This theoretical framing relates prototype phenomenon and implicit models to common cognitive paths in the understanding of the relationship between quadrilaterals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14794800008520167

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Battista M. T., 2007, Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
  2. Crowley M. L., 1987, Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12
  3. Currie P., 1998, Teaching Mathematics in New Times, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia, 177
  4. de Villiers M., 1994, For the Learning of Mathematics, 14, 11
  5. de Villiers M., 1998, Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 248
  6. 10.1007/s10758-006-9106-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF01273689 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/748969 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/14794800008520114 · DOI
  10. Fujita , T. & Jones , K. ( 2003b ) Interpretations of National Curricula: the case of geometry in Japan and the UK , paper presented at the 2003 BERA Conference, Heriot-Watt University, September 2003 .
  11. Fujita , T. & Jones , K. ( 2006 ) Primary trainee teachers’ understanding of basic geometrical figures in Scotland , Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 3 , 14 – 21 .
  12. Hershkowitz R., 1990, Mathematics and Cognition
  13. Jones K., 2002, Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 22, 95
  14. Kawasaki M., 1992, The New Perspective of Mathematics Education
  15. Koseki K., 1987, The Teaching of Geometrical Proof
  16. Kunimune S., 2000, Japan Society of Mathematical Education, Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education. Mathematical education, 82, 2
  17. Markman E. M., 1991, Categorization and Naming in Children: problems of induction, 10.7551/mitpress/1750.001.0001 · DOI
  18. 10.1023/A:1004175020394 · DOI
  19. Nakahara , T. ( 1995 ) Children's construction process of the concepts of basic quadrilaterals in Japan , Proceedings of the 19 th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 3 , 27 – 34 .
  20. Okazaki M., 1995, Japan Academic Society of Mathematics Education, Research in Mathematics Education, 1, 45
  21. Okazaki M., 1999, Japan Academic Society of Mathematics Education, Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 101
  22. Okazaki , M. & Fujita , T. ( 2007 ) Prototype phenomena and common cognitive paths in the understanding of the inclusion relations between quadrilaterals in Japan and Scotland , Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 4 , 41 – 8 . South Korea, July 2007 .
  23. Okazaki M., 2003, Japan Society of Mathematical Education, Report on Mathematical Education, 80, 3
  24. Poincaré H., 1914, Science and Method (trans. F. Maitland)
  25. 2001, Teaching and Learning Geometry 11-19
  26. 10.2307/749519 · DOI
  27. Usiskin Z., 2007, The Classification of Quadrilaterals: a study in definition
  28. van Hiele P. M., 1999, Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 310, 10.5951/TCM.5.6.0310 · DOI
  29. van Hiele P. M., 1986, Structure and Insight: a theory of mathematics education
  30. Vinner S., 1991, Advanced Mathematical Thinking
  31. Vinner , S. & Hershkowitz , R. ( 1980 ) Concept images and some common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometric concepts , Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 177 – 184 .
  32. Zaslavsky O., 2005, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 317

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Fujita, T., & Jones, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Research in Mathematics Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-04
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 1479-4802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-0178
DOI
10.1080/14794800008520167
OpenAlex
W2101601745
Cited by
177
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
Keywords
quadrilaterals, hierarchical classification, mathematical definitions, learner comprehension, implicit models, logical deduction, geometry learning, theoretical framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.