The assessment culture of mathematics in Finland: a student perspective
Open accessAbstract
This study outlines the assessment culture of mathematics in Finnish basic education (grades 6 and 9) based on a nationally-sampled dataset (N = 673). The study draws on the theoretical framework of assessment cultures as defined through cultures of learning, compliance and fear. We approach the assessment culture of mathematics through the student perspective. Students responded to a survey of how often summative and formative assessment practises were used in mathematics, and how useful they perceived them to be. A cluster analysis was conducted to understand the various student sub-groups on the basis of their perceptions of assessment. Overall, the results highlight the dominating role of exams as the backbone of mathematics assessment. Based on these findings, we conclude that in Finland, where assessment in basic education is mainly low-stakes, and where there are no national tests at this level, the assessment culture of mathematics largely represents a culture of compliance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When pedagogical conservatism collides with the low stakes of assessment, assessment might entail a 'culture of compliance'.
“In our earlier study (Nieminen & Atjonen, 2022), we noted that when this conservatism collides with the low stakes of assessment, assessment might entail a 'culture of compliance'.”
From Diversity of assessment practices and student perceptions of assessment in Finland (2025) · cites this paper as Nieminen & Atjonen, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Atjonen P., 2019, Että tietää missä on menossa": oppimisen ja osaamisen arviointi perusopetuksessa ja lukiokoulutuksessa [”So that we know where we stand” assessment of learning and competence in basic education and general upper secondary education]
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Banta T. W., 2002, Building a scholarship of assessment
- 10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown G. T., 2007, Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 63
- 10.1177/1745499918761938 · DOI
- Camargo M., 2014, Proceedings of the 8th British congress of mathematics education, 41
- 10.1080/10476210.2016.1229291 · DOI
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- Dochy F., 2007, Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term, 87
- 10.1007/s10212-012-0125-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001 · DOI
- 10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102 · DOI
- 10.1353/rhe.2016.0022 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003117810 · DOI
- 10.1093/teamat/hrr017 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079.2013.858683 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40753-019-00086-5 · DOI
- Iannone P., 2021, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 1
- 10.1007/978-94-6300-776-4_5 · DOI
- 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593103 · DOI
- 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593104 · DOI
- Maki P., 2012, Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution
- 10.1080/14926156.2015.1119336 · DOI
- 10.22329/jtl.v13i2.5971 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220670209596593 · DOI
- 10.5539/jedp.v4n2p145 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2020.1753687 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079.2019.1688282 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2020.1753687 · DOI
- Palm T., 2017, Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 22, 25
- 10.1080/0969594X.2021.1930444 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.004 · DOI
- Rieg S., 2007, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34, 214
- Robinson, C. & Fielding, M. (2007). Children and their primary schools: Pupils’ voices. Primary Review Research Survey 5/3. University of Cambridge. https://cprtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Research-Survey-5-3.pdf [retrieved 16 September 2020].
- 10.1162/0011526054622015 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602938.2018.1447082 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636 · DOI · Paper page
- Sunzuma G., 2012, International Journal of Current Research, 4, 145
- 10.1080/0969594X.2010.497469 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11092-014-9195-0 · DOI
- Suurtamm C., 2016, Assessment in mathematics education. Large-scale assessment and classroom assessment. ICME 13 topical surveys
- 10.1007/s11858-020-01174-6 · DOI
- Veldhuis M., 2013, Cadmo, 21, 35
- 10.1007/s10763-017-9841-3 · DOI
- Authors
- Nieminen, J. H., & Atjonen, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Nieminen, Juuso Henrik
- Venue
- Research in Mathematics Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-03-27
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-262
- ISSN
- 1479-4802 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-0178
- OpenAlex
- W4221103025
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- evaluation culture, mathematics assessment, student perceptions, summative assessment, formative assessment, examinations, culture of fear, learning culture, low-stakes assessment, basic education, Finland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
