Confidence, social and special treatment benefits as predictors of relationship strength in recreation settings
Abstract
This research uses the relational benefits framework to investigate the relative utility of confidence (i.e., trust, consistency of service), social (i.e., friendships, personal recognition), and special treatment (i.e., priority service, price breaks) benefits in predicting recreation participants’ self‐reported relationship strength with service providers in the public, not‐for‐profit, and private sectors. Fitness class participants (N=255) completed a questionnaire asking about the extent to which they received each type of benefit in their interactions with the organization. The three relational benefits were found to explain significant variance in relationship strength scores above and beyond behavioural variables such as length or frequency of participation. Only social and confidence benefits were significant predictors of relationship strength, with social benefits being approximately twice as important across the entire sample and the only type of benefit that was significant in all three sectors of service delivery. These findings have implications for future research on client loyalty in recreation settings and for fostering strong bonds with leisure program participants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hennig-Thurau et al. (2002) report a stronger effect of confidence benefits on customer outcomes relative to social or special treatment benefits, whereas Meldrum and Kaczynski (2007) find a stronger effect of social benefits.
“For example, Hennig-Thurau et al. (2002) report a stronger effect of confidence benefits on customer outcomes, relative to social or special treatment benefits, whereas Meldrum and Kaczynski (2007) find a stronger effect of social benefits.”
From Understanding and managing customer relational benefits in services: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Meldrum and Kaczynski 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Meldrum, J. T., & Kaczynski, A. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- ORCID
- Kaczynski, Andrew T.
- Venue
- Leisure/Loisir
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 325-345
- ISSN
- 1492-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2221
- OpenAlex
- W2091916881
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leisure/Loisir (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- relationship strength, relationship benefits, trust, social benefits, special treatment benefits, customer loyalty, exercise classes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review