Cited by 8Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Confidence, social and special treatment benefits as predictors of relationship strength in recreation settings

Meldrum, John T., Kaczynski, Andrew T.·2007·Leisure/Loisir

Abstract

This research uses the relational benefits framework to investigate the relative utility of confidence (i.e., trust, consistency of service), social (i.e., friendships, personal recognition), and special treatment (i.e., priority service, price breaks) benefits in predicting recreation participants’ self‐reported relationship strength with service providers in the public, not‐for‐profit, and private sectors. Fitness class participants (N=255) completed a questionnaire asking about the extent to which they received each type of benefit in their interactions with the organization. The three relational benefits were found to explain significant variance in relationship strength scores above and beyond behavioural variables such as length or frequency of participation. Only social and confidence benefits were significant predictors of relationship strength, with social benefits being approximately twice as important across the entire sample and the only type of benefit that was significant in all three sectors of service delivery. These findings have implications for future research on client loyalty in recreation settings and for fostering strong bonds with leisure program participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14927713.2007.9651383

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hennig-Thurau et al. (2002) report a stronger effect of confidence benefits on customer outcomes relative to social or special treatment benefits, whereas Meldrum and Kaczynski (2007) find a stronger effect of social benefits.

    “For example, Hennig-Thurau et al. (2002) report a stronger effect of confidence benefits on customer outcomes, relative to social or special treatment benefits, whereas Meldrum and Kaczynski (2007) find a stronger effect of social benefits.”

    From Understanding and managing customer relational benefits in services: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Meldrum and Kaczynski 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 8

Authors
Meldrum, J. T., & Kaczynski, A. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Leisure/Loisir
Published
2007-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
325-345
ISSN
  • 1492-7713 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2221
OpenAlex
W2091916881
Cited by
8
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Leisure/Loisir (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
relationship strength, relationship benefits, trust, social benefits, special treatment benefits, customer loyalty, exercise classes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review