Cited by 56Selenium in Biological SystemsEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyOrganoselenium and organotellurium chemistry

Biotransfer Possibilities of Selenium from Plants Used in Phytoremediation

Open access
Ba$nTuelos, G. S., Vickerman, D. B., Trumble, J. T., Shannon, M. C., Davis, C. D., Finley, J. W., Mayland, H. F.·2002·International Journal of Phytoremediation

Abstract

We are investigating the biotransfer of accumulated Se by the plant in several phytoremediation systems. In study I, we evaluated the biotransfer of Se from Indian mustard, a Brassica species, to the insect-cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni); mortality, deterrence, and biomagnification of Se were examined. We determined that feeding behavior of food chain consumers was affected not only by the plant concentration of Se, but also by the mobility of the insects and choice of feed available. In study II, we examined the survival and development of beet army worm (Spodoptera exigua) fed Se-enriched plant tissues from different lines of saltbush (Atriplex spp.) After feeding on lines of saltbush that produced high biomass and accumulated high concentrations of Se, insect growth and survival was reduced. In studies III, IV, and V, lambs, dairy cows, and rabbits were fed Se-enriched Brassica and Medicago (alfalfa) plants as part of their feed ration. None of the tested animals exhibited any Se toxicity symptoms, but they had increased levels of Se in most tissues sampled (e.g., organs, blood, urine, feces), excluding milk. In study VI, we evaluated biotransfer of Se from broccoli to rats to determine efficacy of Se for reducing colon cancer. We found that Se-enriched plant material was more effective than inorganic sources of Se for preventing precancerous colon lesions. Results from all studies clearly show that Se absorbed by plants can be transferred biologically in an intentional or unintentional manner to insects and animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15226510208500090

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ba$nTuelos, G. S., Vickerman, D. B., Trumble, J. T., Shannon, M. C., Davis, C. D., Finley, J. W., & Mayland, H. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center (US)
Venue
International Journal of Phytoremediation
Published
2002-10
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
315-329
ISSN
  • 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7879
OpenAlex
W2141243665
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
  • Northwest Irrigation & Soils Research Laboratory Publications (United States Department of Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Organoselenium and organotellurium chemistry
Keywords
selenium, phytoremediation, selenium accumulation in plants, Brassica juncea, Brassica, Trichoplusia ni, Spodoptera exigua, Atriplex, alfalfa, Medicago, broccoli, colon cancer prevention, biomagnification, insect feeding behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review