Cited by 46Heavy metals in environmentMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soil by vetiver grass

Bahraminia, Mahboobeh, Zarei, Mehdi, Ronaghi, Abdolmajid, Ghasemi-Fasaei, Reza·2016·International Journal of Phytoremediation

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in phytoremediation of lead (Pb)-contaminated soil by vetiver grass. Experiment was a factorial arranged in a completely randomized design. Factors included four Pb levels (50, 200, 400, and 800 mg kg(-1)) as Pb (NO3)2, AM fungi at three levels (non mycorrhizal (NM) control, Rhizophagus intraradices, Glomus versiforme). Shoot and root dry weights (SDW and RDW) decreased as Pb levels increased. Mycorrhizal inoculation increased SDW and RDW compared to NM control. With mycorrhizal inoculation and increasing Pb levels, Pb uptake of shoot and root increased compared to those of NM control. Root colonization increased with mycorrhizal inoculation but decreased as Pb levels increased. Phosphorus concentration and uptake in shoot of plants inoculated with AM fungi was significantly higher than NM control at 200 and 800 mg Pb kg(-1). The Fe concentration, Fe and Mn uptake of shoot in plants inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices in all levels of Pb were significantly higher than NM control. Mycorrhizal inoculation increased Pb extraction, uptake and translocation efficiencies. Lead translocation factor decreased as Pb levels increased; however inoculation with AM fungi increased Pb translocation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15226514.2015.1131242

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to its sorption with soil, lead is not readily accessible in biological systems and has limited solubility at normal pH, making it unavailable for plant absorption even by hyperaccumulators.

    “Due to its sorption with soil, lead is not readily accessible in biological systems and has a limited solubility at normal pH, making it unavailable for plant absorption even by hyperaccumulators (Chen et al., 2004; Bahraminia et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bahraminia, M., Zarei, M., Ronaghi, A., & Ghasemi-Fasaei, R.
Affiliations
Shiraz University (IR)
Corresponding author
Zarei, Mehdi
Venue
International Journal of Phytoremediation
Published
2015-12-28
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
730-737
ISSN
  • 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7879
OpenAlex
W2280680096
Cited by
46
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, phytoremediation, lead contamination, soil remediation, Vetiveria zizanioides, Glomus intraradices, Glomus versiforme, lead uptake, lead translocation, root colonization, phosphorus uptake, heavy metal toxicity
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Lead, Random Allocation, Soil Pollutants, Species Specificity, Plant Roots, Plant Shoots, Mycorrhizae, Chrysopogon, Glomeromycota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review