CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Heavy Metal Pollution RemediationHeavy metals in environmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Iron plaque formation in the roots of Pistia stratiotes L.: importance in phytoremediation of cadmium

Singha, Kambam Tamna, Sebastian, Abin, Prasad, Majeti Narasimha Vara·2019·International Journal of Phytoremediation
DOI 10.1080/15226514.2018.1474442
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aquatic macrophytes play an important role in the removal of toxic metals from wastewater. Therefore, the induction of Fe plaque on the roots, and its consequences on Cd tolerance investigated in an aquatic macrophyte Pistia stratiotes L. The presence of Fe2+ ion but not Fe3+ resulted in Fe plaque formation. Induction of Fe plaque decreased Ca and increased K and Fe accumulations in the root. Plaque formed plants had accumulated less Cd until 50.0 µM CdCl2 treatments because plaque acted as a barrier to Cd exposure. However, at higher concentrations (500.0 µM CdCl2), plaque formed plants contained more Cd in the roots. Cadmium inducible ion leakage in the root and lowering of the photosynthetic pigment content were less in plants with a plaque. Stretching of aromatic carbonyl groups and alkyl groups among plaque formed plants upon Cd treatments indicated the putative role of phenolics in Cd detoxification.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15226514.2018.1474442

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/aob/mcl110 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01490450701457329 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00115-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00128-013-1152-y · DOI
  6. 10.1111/boj.12373 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.01.017 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/s40659-015-0001-3 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/400_2007_044 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0701954104 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0153475 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.009 · DOI
  13. Holser RA. 2012. Principal component analysis of phenolic acid spectra. ISRN Spectroscopy. 2012:Article ID 493203, 5 pages. doi:org/10.5402/2012/493203 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/jxb/eri301 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10452-009-9241-z · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.1365-2621.2002.00552.x · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s004250100610 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11356-012-1054-2 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s40529-014-0047-5 · DOI
  20. 10.1104/pp.92.1.17 · DOI
  21. Louise SC, 1996, Biogeochemistry, 33, 45
  22. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.10.012 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.018 · DOI
  24. 10.1590/S0100-06832014000100018 · DOI
  25. Márquez-García B, 2012, J Bot. 2012:Article ID 936950
  26. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.07.024 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.817 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.032 · DOI
  29. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144214 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/s130810823 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/15226510801913918 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00058-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/15226514.2012.751352 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s13593-013-0152-y · DOI
  35. 10.3390/agronomy5030374 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s00709-015-0770-0 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/plb.12484 · DOI
  38. Sebastian A, 2015, Trace elements in temporary waterlogged soils and sediments” Bioavailability, geochemical processes, management, and remediation approaches, 313
  39. 10.4161/psb.6.2.14880 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb04863.x · DOI
  41. Sundeep Kumar HK, 2015, Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci, 6, 361
  42. 10.1007/s11738-012-1169-6 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/01904168209362959 · DOI
  44. 10.4319/lo.2000.45.5.1130 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/01904160903242417 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102101 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/aob/mct072 · DOI
  48. 10.1104/pp.010869 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s11515-009-0024-7 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0304-3770(98)00057-6 · DOI
  51. 10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700030032x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Asbestos and Iron

    Ghio, A. J., Stewart, M., Sangani, R. G., Pavlisko, E. N., & Roggli, V. L. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241512390 · Cited by 15

    “In another related pathway of iron biomineralization, iron plaque formation in plants is dependent on the availability of Fe2+, which reacts with oxygen to generate Fe3+ oxyhydroxides and deposits it on root surfaces [140,141].”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Singha, K. T., Sebastian, A., & Prasad, M. N. V.
Affiliations
University of Hyderabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Prasad, Majeti Narasimha Vara
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Phytoremediation
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-01-28
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
120-128
ISSN
  • 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7879
DOI
10.1080/15226514.2018.1474442
OpenAlex
W2913623383
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
iron plaque, Pistia stratiotes, cadmium, phytoremediation, cadmium tolerance, aquatic macrophytes, metal accumulation in roots, iron(II) ions, electrolyte leakage, photosynthetic pigments, phenolic compounds, cadmium detoxification, heavy metal contamination
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Cadmium, Iron, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Plant Roots, Araceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review