Cited by 142Multilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and TeachingTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

From Preservice to Practice: Mainstream Elementary Teacher Beliefs of Preparation and Efficacy with English Language Learners in the State of Florida

Coady, Maria, Harper, Candace, de Jong, Ester·2011·Bilingual Research Journal

Abstract

The relationship between English Language Learners' (ELL) academic achievement and teacher education programs that prepare preservice teachers for working with those students has largely been ignored in the literature to date. This article reports findings from a study of how graduates from one elementary teacher education program, in which the state-required English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) teacher credential has been “infused” evaluated their preparedness for and efficacy in working with ELLs in mainstream classroom settings. Our analysis of 85 survey responses revealed a positive relationship between teachers' views of their preparation for and effectiveness in teaching ELLs. A positive association was also found between teachers' ability to speak a language other than English (LOTE) and their level of preparedness to teach ELLs. Teacher graduates considered direct field experiences with ELLs to be the most helpful component of the preservice preparation program. Survey findings and implications for teacher preparation programs and the preparation of high-quality teachers of ELLs are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15235882.2011.597823

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Field experiences can be beneficial in guiding preservice teachers' understanding of ELLs and their needs.

    “Furthermore, field experiences can be beneficial in guiding preservice teachers' understanding of ELLs and their needs (Coady, Harper, & de Jong, 2011).”

    From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Coady, Harper, & de Jong, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coady, M., Harper, C., & de Jong, E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Coady, Maria
Venue
Bilingual Research Journal
Published
2011-06
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
223-239
ISSN
  • 1523-5882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5890
OpenAlex
W2032372969
Cited by
142
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bilingual Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
English language learners, initial teacher education, teacher beliefs, teacher self-efficacy, mainstream classrooms, primary teacher education, non-English languages, practicum, teacher readiness, Florida

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review