The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governing Towards Sustainability—Conceptualizing Modes of Governance
Abstract
There is a growing scientific debate regarding the suitability of certain modes of governance for promoting sustainable development (SD). However, thus far there is neither agreement on ways to meaningfully distinguish and understand governance modes nor a foundation of the aspects to be chosen for this endeavour. In order to overcome this conceptual vagueness, this paper presents a meta-framework for a sound conceptualization of governance modes. Founded on a reinterpretation of the discourse ‘from government to governance’, we argue that only a multi-dimensional approach giving consideration to political processes (politics), institutional structures (polity) and policy content (policy) adequately captures the complexity of governance phenomena. We furthermore highlight possible key features for exploring these dimensions and compare three recently published frameworks for modes of governance. By offering a sound conceptual clarification of governance modes, we facilitate both their meaningful differentiation and a more systematic understanding of their inherent complexity. In so doing, we inform both theoretical and empirical research on governance for SD. We pave the way not only for making more differentiated theoretical statements on the relationship between governance modes and SD but also for empirically exploring this relationship on a profound basis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831739 · Cited by 5,140
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm · Cited by 4,229
Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 3,816
Governance as theory: five propositions
Stoker, G. (1998) · International Social Science Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00106 · Cited by 2,758
Institutions and Organizations
Baum, J. A. C., & Scott, W. R. (1998) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654789 · Cited by 2,754
Kooiman, J. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781446215012 · Cited by 2,656
Multi-Level Governance and European Integration
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2002) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216401537 · Cited by 2,598
(2000) · Cited by 2,436
Metadata
- Authors
- Lange, P., Driessen, P. P. J., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., & Burger, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-03-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-425
- ISSN
- 1522-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-908X
- OpenAlex
- W2109279826
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Governing Towards Sustainability—Conceptualizing Modes of Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1523908x.2013.769414
- The paper
- Lange, P., Driessen, P. P. J., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., & Burger, P. (2013). Governing Towards Sustainability—Conceptualizing Modes of Governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2013.769414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.