Apomediation and the significance of online social networking
Abstract
Famously, when research dermatologist Albert Kilgman first entered Holmesburg (Philadelphia, PA) prison, he said that instead of individual prisoners, all he saw before him, “were acres of skin. It...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This study suggests that OHCs can be a facilitator of, rather than a barrier to, shared decision making between patients/caregivers and HCPs.
“From a theoretical perspective, this study suggests that OHCs can be a facilitator of, rather than a barrier to, shared decision making between patients/caregivers and HCPs.[34–35]”
From Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities (2014) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness
Eysenbach, G. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1030 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing
McGuire, A. L., Diaz, C. M., Wang, T., & Hilsenbeck, S. G. (2009) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160902928209 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg Prison
Thompson, A. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.17.1542-a · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) Genomics
Lee, S. S., & Crawley, L. M. (2009) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160902874452 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities
Rupert, D. J., Moultrie, R. R., Read, J. G., Amoozegar, J. B., Bornkessel, A. S., O’Donoghue, A. C., & Sullivan, H. W. (2014) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.015 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
- Authors
- O'Connor, D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- O'Connor, Dan
- Venue
- The American Journal of Bioethics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06-22
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- 25-27
- ISSN
- 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0075
- OpenAlex
- W2146342025
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
- Keywords
- online social networking, prisoners, skin diseases, dermatology, social media, prison health care
- MeSH terms
- Community Participation, Counseling, Genetic Testing, Health Personnel, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Marketing of Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Social Support, Genome, Human, Negotiating, Internet, Consumer Health Information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
