Cited by 2Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsEthics and bioethics in healthcareBioethics and Human Rights Issues

A Thomistic Account of Anti-Love Biotechnology

Boesch, Brandon·2013·The American Journal of Bioethics

Abstract

Earp and colleagues (2013) provide an overview and ethical discussion of anti-love biotechnology. Though they are working from a much different tradition, I want to show that the Thomistic traditio...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15265161.2013.839753

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Underlying human romantic attachment is a collection of interlocking brain systems hypothesized to have evolved to suit the reproductive needs of our ancestors.

    “Underlying human romantic attachment is a collection of interlocking brain systems that are hypothesized to have evolved to suit the reproductive needs of our ancestors.”

    From The Medicalization of Love (2015) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Brain chemicals such as oxytocin, dopamine, testosterone, and many others seem to regulate interpersonal drives and emotions, including the formation of romantic pair-bonds.

    “Brain chemicals such as oxytocin, dopamine, testosterone, and many others seem to regulate our interpersonal drives and emotions, including the formation of romantic pair-bonds.”

    From The Medicalization of Love (2015) · cites this paper as [25]

  • These underlying brain phenomena do much to shape, as well as respond to, higher-level romantic experiences across a wide range of theoretical conceptions.

    “Although love is not simply reducible to these brain chemicals or pathways—and although there are many different theories of love, including how it should be defined—what is clear by now is that these underlying phenomena do much to shape (as well as to respond to) our higher-level romantic experiences, across a wide range of theoretical conceptions.”

    From The Medicalization of Love (2015) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boesch, B.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Boesch, Brandon
Venue
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2013-11
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
30-31
ISSN
  • 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0075
OpenAlex
W2090788301
Cited by
2
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
Keywords
Thomism, Thomas Aquinas, bioethics, love, human enhancement, reproductive technology, ethics of biotechnology
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotechnology, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Libido, Love, Male, Object Attachment, Psychotropic Drugs, Sexual Behavior, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review