Cited by 11Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Mental Health Interventions

Therapeutic conversational artificial intelligence and the Acquisition of Self-understanding

Open access
Grodniewicz, J. P., Hohol, Mateusz·2023·The American Journal of Bioethics

Abstract

This article refers to:Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy: A New Therapeutic Tool or Agent?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15265161.2023.2191021

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactions with a chatbot implementing CBT techniques might put a user in a better position to recognize the connections between one's emotions, motivations, thoughts, and behavior, past and present, including one's interpretations of and relations with others, which is arguably at least an element of acquiring self-understanding.

    “as we argue in (58), interactions with a chatbot implementing CBT techniques might put a user in a better position to recognize “the connections between one’s emotions, motivations, thoughts, and behavior, past and present, including one’s interpretations of and relations with others” (59) (pp. 154–5), which is arguably at least an element of the process of acquiring self-understanding.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gordon, E. C. 2017. Social epistemology and the acquisition of understanding. In Explaining understanding: New perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science , ed. S. Grimm, C. Baumberger, and S. Ammon, 293 -317. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M.
Affiliations
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Corresponding author
Grodniewicz, J. P.
Venue
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2023-05-02
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
59-61
ISSN
  • 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0075
OpenAlex
W4367693059
Cited by
11
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
conversational AI, therapeutic chatbots, self-understanding, self-knowledge, psychotherapy, artificial intelligence in mental health care
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review