CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Identity, Memory, and TherapyModernity and Self-IdentitySocial Representations and Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Who Am I, Who Are We? Erikson and a Transactional Approach to Identity Research

Rogers, Leoandra Onnie·2018·Identity
DOI 10.1080/15283488.2018.1523728
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Erik Erikson introduced identity as a universal developmental task that provides the foundation for an individual’s general sense of well-being. Erikson’s (1968) theorizing about the self, however, was simultaneously about society—a psychosocial process. The contemporary identity literature privileges the “psycho” over the “social,” which limits our understanding of the role of identity processes in society more broadly. This article returns to Erikson’s concept of psychosocial relativity, which he used to define identity, in order to describe a transactional approach to examining identity processes, an approach wherein self and society are actively and jointly (re)constructed. The paper also provides examples of three approaches to transactional identity research from the existing literature and concludes with recommendations for how to further such scholarship. The thesis is that adopting a transactional approach extends the relevance of identity research and positions identity as a tangible lever that can shift who we are becoming in the direction of a more equitable and humane society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15283488.2018.1523728

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.4159/harvard.9780674731837 · DOI
  2. Gilligan C. (2011). Joining the resistance. Cambridge MA: Polity Press.
  3. 10.1111/asap.2013.13.issue-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/josi.2001.57.issue-3 · DOI
  5. Rogers, L. O. (2018b). The “Black Box”: Identity development and the crisis of connection. In N. Way, A. Ali, C. Gilligan, & P. A. Noguera (Eds.), The Crisis of Connection: Its Roots, Consequences, and Solutions (pp. 129–150). New York, NY: NYU Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, L. O.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Leoandra Onnie
ORCID
Rogers, Leoandra Onnie
Venue
Identity
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2018-10
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
284-294
ISSN
  • 1528-3488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-706X
DOI
10.1080/15283488.2018.1523728
OpenAlex
W2895661633
Cited by
107
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Identity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Modernity and Self-Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
Erik Erikson, identity construction, transactional approach, self and society, social construction of identity, identity processes, psychosocial development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review