The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serum paraoxonase status: A major factor in determining resistance to organophosphates
Abstract
A number of lines of evidence suggest that serum paraoxonase is protective against poisoning by organophosphorus substrates of this enzyme. Birds that have very low levels of paraoxon hydrolyzing activity in their sera are very susceptible to parathion poisoning. Rabbits, which have a sevenfold higher enzyme level compared with rats, have a fourfold higher resistance to paraoxon poisoning than rats. Rabbit paraoxonase hydrolyzes chlorpyrifos-oxon with a much higher turnover number than does rat paraoxonase, resulting in a very high resistance of rabbits to chlorpyrifos toxicity. Direct tests of paraoxonase protection have been carried out by injecting purified rabbit enzyme into rats. The protection achieved was higher for chlorpyrifos-oxon than for paraoxon, probably due to the high hydrolytic activity of the rabbit enzyme for chlorpyrifos-oxon. In humans, a substrate-dependent polymorphism of serum paraoxonase is observed, where one isoform of paraoxonase has a high turnover number for paraoxon and the other a low turnover number. Both isoforms appear to hydrolyze chlorpyrifos-oxon and phenylacetate at the same rate. Cloning and sequencing of the human paraoxonase cDNAs has elucidated the molecular basis of the polymorphism. Arginine at position 192 determines high paraoxonase activity, and glutamine at this position, low paraoxonase activity. In addition to the polymorphism, a 13-fold variation in serum enzyme levels within a given genetic class is seen. The experiments reported here demonstrate that rabbit paraoxonase injected into mice provides protection against the parent insecticide chlorpyrifos as well as the toxic oxon. These results suggest that serum paraoxonase status may serve as a biomarker for insecticide susceptibility in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid
Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., & Klenk, D. C. (1985) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7 · Cited by 18,482
Cited by
Li, W.-F., Costa, L. G., Richter, R. J., Hagen, T., Shih, D. M., Tward, A., Lusis, A. J., & Furlong, C. E. (2000) · Pharmacogenetics · doi:10.1097/00008571-200012000-00002 · Cited by 276
Self-citationCosta, L. G., Cole, T. B., Jarvik, G. P., & Furlong, C. E. (2003) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152421 · Cited by 264
Self-citationOxidative imbalance in child and adolescent patients with obsessive compulsive disorder
Kandemir, H., Abuhandan, M., Aksoy, N., Savik, E., & Kaya, C. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.08.010 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Costa, L. G., & Furlong, C. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 337-346
- ISSN
- 0098-4108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080425697
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum paraoxonase status: A major factor in determining resistance to organophosphates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15287399309531798
- The paper
- Li, W., Costa, L. G., & Furlong, C. E. (1993). Serum paraoxonase status: A major factor in determining resistance to organophosphates. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287399309531798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.